jak mabe aris avert suspicion from her. for a man er von are a Ar ementing at great length ars of in the evidence of the witnesses, and tegen de Granger said he had felt great Svan The war in Jn cety for the fate of the unfortinate prisoner at the commencement of those proceedings, but he 1ow was considerably relieved, as be fit assured that no jury would eonret on the evidence of the witneses Lamb and Arnott. ty of pray the monet në the sed and the love u s. Tuma hai: i 14 > treat semar Samui in Mr. Tonen i mitt that was a ming modenes, is the serrassa sigut ether hire the ame thread waaf their met's be the pe Mr. Thoms bent the keys, and they are matwa to have been out of her possession, and the produced them when required without the slightest hesitation. Was that the conduct of a person conscious of guilt? Isabella Lamb had an opportunity of taking the keys between the hours of è and 11 o'clock, and she, in conjunction with Arnott, might have admitted some one into the bank, or they might have planned and executed the robbery themselves, and been frustrated in fully carrying out their intentions. The whole conduct of Mrs. Thomson, both before and after the robbery, was calcu The learned Recorder then pro led to sum up the evidence. He said, the ease rested in a great measure on the eredibility of the witnesses Lamb and Arnott, and it was for the jury to say whether they could depend upon the evidence of those persons. The learned Recorder pointed out with great minuteness the discrepancies in the evidence, and observed that, if they could be reconciled, the jury might find the prisoner guilty. He did not himself see how they could be reconciled with a presumption of the prisoner's guilt. If they took the same view they would, of course, acquit the prisoner; if not, they would find her guilty. The jury, after a short consultation, returned a verdict of "Not Guilty." |