as poffible to principles; but to render the
work ufeful in practice, I have added a Digeft
of the more modern Cafes, fo claffed toge-
ther as to be eafily referred to when fimilar
points arife.
Some few decifions being frequently referred
to as leading cafes, on particular parts of the
Law of Evidence, I have added them by way
of Appendix, that the reader may have an
opportunity of referring to them, when he
has not the advantage of his library; and
thofe cafes which being in MS. are not already
open to the profeffion, are alfo printed at
length, fome by way of note in the page
where cited, others in the Appendix at the
end of the work.
Though of fmall fize, this work has been
attended with a confiderable portion of labour;
reference has been had to all the cafes cited,
and no reliance placed on Digefts, Abridg-
ments, or former Treatifes on the fubject; ftill
I fear that, in the attempt to blend and con-
folidate fo many cafes, fome errors may have
efcaped my obfervation; for thefe I folicit
the indulgence of a liberal profeffion, and
fhall gratefully receive any hint from the
candid and friendly critic for their correction.
Thofe printed in Italics were not cited in the First Edition.
Abbot v. Plumbe, 98
Abeny v. Dickenson, 92
Abrahams v. Bunn, 146, 148
Adams v. Kerr, 100
Alban v. Pritchet, 17
Bath v. Montague, 145
Balcctti v. Serani, 103
Bauerman v. Radenius, 16, 18
Ballis v. Attorney-general, 117
Bedle v. Beard, 22
Berry v. Banner, 40
Benfon v. Olive, 59
Altham v. Earl of Anglefea, 113 Benjon v. Port, 95
Bent v. Baker, 144, 157, 158
Bennet v. Hundred of Hertford,
Bromwich's Cafe, 62
Bretton v. Cope, '91, 98
Brady v. Cubit, 114
Brazier's Cafe, 123
Brown v. Selwin, 113
Brown v. Corporation of London, 164
Brown v. M Kinnally, 35
Brownfon v. Avery, 165
Broughton v. Harper, 175
Bucher v. Jarrat, 107
Bunting's Cafe, 77
Burleigh v. Stibbs, 96
Burton v. Hinde, 162
Butler v. Cooke, 168
Bufby v. Geeenslate, 170
Bufh v. Rawlins, 172
Buckland v. Tankard, 172
Call (Bart.) v. Dunning, 98
Carpenters, &c. (Company of)
v. Hayward, 163
Calvert v. Bovil, 71
Cary v. Pitt, 102, 105
Cates v. Winter, 107
Caftle v. Bambridge, 143
Carter v. Pearce, 171
Cafs v. Cameron, 172
Chapman v. Pointon, 192
Chichester v. Phillips, 69
Chriftie v. Secretan, 71
Chandler v. Roberts, 75
Chattle v. Pound, 1 10
Cheney's Cafe, 112
Chater v. Hawkins, 127 Chapman v. Gardner, 168 Chelsea Water-works (Gov. and
Company of) v. Cowper, 110 Clarke v. Shee, 164 Clerk v. Bedford, 14 Clewes v. Bathurst, 77
Clutterbuck v. Lord Hunting
tower, 171
Cobden v. Kenrick, 128
Cock v. Wortham, 166
Coghlan v. Williamson, 100
Coker v. Farewell, 60
Cooke's Cafe, 135
Cooke v. Booth, 120
Cooke v. Loxley, 21
Cooke v. Sholl, 48
Cooper v. Mariden, 15
Cope v. Bedford, 89
East India Company v. Gofling, | Green v. Hewitt, 85
Ecclefton v. Petty, 54
Edwards v. Vesey, 92
v. Evans, 172
Eldridge v. Knott, 24
Elfam v. Faucet, 7
Emerfon v. Blendon, 17
Evans v. Williams, 165
New River Company; 166
Green-volt v. Burrel, 92
Gully's Cafe, 128
Evelyn (Sir Fred.) v. Haynes, 37 Hall v. Hill, 17
Haffelden v. Bradney, 22
Harvey's Cafe, 76
Haftings' Cafe, 126
Hatch v. Bliffet, 194
Havelock v. Rockwood, 72
Hawkins v. Perkins, 132
Henry v. Adey, 72
Henley's Cafe, 102
Henshaw v. Pleafance, 48
Herbert v. Cooke, 75
Herbert v. Afhburner, 92
Hereford (Bishop of) v. Duke of
Heward v. Shipley, 172
Bridgewater, 93
Hill v. Fleming, 153
Hillyard v. Grantham, 43
Hitchin v. Campbel, 36
Hobfon v. Parker, 93
Holdfaft dem. Anitey v. Dowling,
Ilderton v. Atkinson, 165
Grant v. Jackson, 55
Grellier v. Neale, 98
Graft v. Lord Brownlow Bertie,
Jones v. Randall, 23, 34, 53 White, 85
|