« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »
support the clerical character when he assumed it, first with decency, and afterwards with honour.”
They who think ill of Young's morality in the early part of his life, may perhaps be wrong; but Tindal could not err in his opinion of Young's warmth and ability in the cause of religion. Tindal used to spend much of his time at All-souls. " The other boys," said the atheist, “I can always answer, because I always know whence they have their arguments, which I have read an hundred times ; but that fellow Young is continually pestering me with something of his own.".
After all, Tindal and the censurers of Young may be reconcileable. Young might, for two or three years, have tried that kind of life, in which his natural principles would not suffer him to wallow long. If this were so, he has left behind him not only his evidence in favour of virtue, but the potent testimony of experience against vice.
We shall soon see that one of his earliest productions was more serious than what comes from the generality of unfledged poets.
Young perhaps ascribed the good fortune of Addison to the “Poem to his Majesty," presented, with a copy of verses, to Somers; and hoped that he also might soar to wealth and honours on wings of the same kind. His first poetical flight was when Queen Anne called up to the House ? Lords the sons of the Earls of Northampton and Aylesbury, and added, in one day, ten others to the number of peers. In order to reconcile the people to one at least of the new Lords, he published in 1712 “ An Epistle to the Right Honourable George Lord Lansdowne." In this composition the poet pours out his panegyrick with the extravagance of a young man, who thinks his present stock of wealth will never be exhausted. The poem seems intended also to reconcile the publick to the late peace. This is endeavoured to be done by shewing that men are slain in war, and that in peace harvests wavé, and commerce swells her sail. If this be humanity, is it politicks ? Another purpose of this epistle appears to have been, to prepare the publick for the reception of some tragedy of his own. His Lordship's patronage, he says, will not let him repent his passion for the stage ;—and the particular praise bestowed on “Othello” and “Oroonoko” looks as if some such character as Zanga was even then in contemplation. The affectionate mention of the death of his friend Harrison of New College, at the close of this poem, is an instance of Young's art, which displayed itself so wonderfully some time afterwards in the “Night Thoughts,” of making the publick a party in his private sorrow.
1 House of Lords.
Should justice call upon you to censure this poem, it ought at least to be remembered that he did not insert it into his works; and that in the letter to Curll, as we have seen, he advises its omission. The booksellers, in the late Body of English Poetry, should have distinguished what was deliberately rejected by the respective authors. This I shall be careful to do with regard to Young. “I think, says he, the following pieces in four volumes to be the most excuseable of all that I have written ; and I wish less apology was needful for these. As there is no recalling what is got abroad, the pieces here republished I have revised and corrected, and rendered them as pardonable as it was in my power to do."
Shall the gates of repentance be shut only against lite
rary sinners ?
When Addison published “ Cato” in 1713, Young had the honour of prefixing to it a recommendatory copy of
This is one of the pieces which the author of the “ Night Thoughts ” did not republish.
On the appearance of his “Poem on the Last Day,” Addison did not return Young's compliment; but “The
Englishman” of October 29, 1713, which was probably written by Addison, speaks handsomely of this poem. The “ Last Day” was published soon after the peace. The vice-chancellor's imprimatur, for it was first printed at Oxford, is dated May the 19th, 1713. From the Exordium Young appears to have spent some time on the composition of it. While other bards with Britain's hero set their souls on fire, "he draws, he says, a deeper scene. Marl. borough had been considered by Britain as her hero; but, when the Last Day” was published, female cabal had blasted for a time the laurels of Blenheim. This serious poem was finished by Young as early as 1710, before he was thirty; for part of it is printed in the “Tatler.” It was inscribed to the Queen, in a dedication, which, for some reason, he did not admit into his works. It tells her, that his only title to the great honour he now does himself is the obligation he formerly received from her royal indulgence.
Of this obligation nothing is now known, unless he alluded to her being his godmother. He is said indeed to have been engaged at a settled stipend as a writer for the court. In Swift's "Rhapsody on poetry" are these lines, “
” speaking of the court
“ Whence Gay was banish'd in disgrace,
To flatter knaves, or lose his pension." That Y means Young, is clear from four other lines in the same poem.
“ Attend, ye Popes and Youngs and Gays,
You cannot err on flattery's side."
sioner?' In all modern periods of this country, have not the writers on one side been regularly called Hirelings, and on the other Patriots ?
Of the dedication the complexion is clearly political. It speaks in the highest terms of the late peace ;-it gives her Majesty praise indeed for her victories, but says that the author is more pleased to see her rise from this lower world, soaring above the clouds, passing the first and second heavens, and leaving the fixed stars behind her ;nor will he lose her there, but keep her still in view through the boundless spaces on the other side of Creation, in her journey towards eternal bliss, till he behold the heaven of heavens open, and angels receiving and conveying her still onward from the stretch of his imagination, which tires in her pursuit, and falls back again to earth.
The Queen was soon called away from this lower world, to a place where human praise or human flattery even less general than this are of little consequence. If Young thought the dedication contained only the praise of truth, he should not have omitted it in his works. Was he con. scious of the exaggeration of party? Then he should not have written it. The poem itself is not without a glance to politicks, notwithstanding the subject. The cry that the church was in danger, had not yet subsided. The “ Last Day," written by a layman, was much approved by the ministry, and their friends.
Before the Queen's death, “The force of Religion, or Vanquished Love,” was sent into the world. This poem is founded on the execution of Lady Jane Gray and her husband Lord Guildford in 1554—a story chosen for the subject of a tragedy by Edmund Smith, and wrought into a tragedy by Rowe. The dedication of it to the countess of Salisbury does not appear in his own edition. He hopes it
Mr. Cunningham gives a copy of the warrant signed by George I. for the pension of £200 a-year, dated May 3rd, 1726.
may be some excuse for his presumption that the story could not have been read without thoughts of the Countess of Salisbury, though it had been dedicated to another. “To behold,” he proceeds, “a person only virtuous, stirs in us a prudent regret; to behold a person only amiable to the sight, warms us with a religious indignation; but to turn our eyes on a Countess of Salisbury, gives us pleasure and improvement; it works a sort of miracle, occasions the biass of our nature to fall off from sin, and makes our very senses and affections converts to our religion, and promoters of our duty.” His flattery was as ready for the other sex as for ours, and was at least as well adapted.
August the 27th, 1714, Pope writes to his friend Jervas, that he is just arrived from Oxford—that every one is much concerned for the Queen's death, but that no panegyricks are ready yet for the King. Nothing like friendship had yet taken place between Pope and Young; for, soon after the event which Pope mentions, Young published a poem on the Queen's death, and his Majesty's. accession to the throne. It is inscribed to Addison, then secretary to the Lords Justices. Whatever was the obligation which he had formerly received from Anne, the poet appears to aim at something of the same sort from George. Of the poem the intention seems to have been, to shew that he had the same extravagant strain of praise for a King as for a Queen. To discover, at the very outset of a foreigner's reign, that the Gods bless his new subjects in such a King, is something more than praise. Neither was this deemed one of his excuseable pieces. We do not find it in his works.
Young's father had been well acquainted with Lady Anne Wharton, the first wife of Thomas Wharton, Esq.; afterwards Marquis of Wharton—a Lady celebrated for
1 That is, in the edition of his Works published by the poet himself in 1762, 4 vols. 12mo.