Page images
PDF
EPUB

83, 84

82

Page.
CAPITAL CITY Gas Co. v. CENTRAL VERMONT R. Co..

44, 119
CAPITALIZATION OF RAILWAY PROPERTY..
CAPITAL STOCK OF RAILWAYS

83
CAPPS, C. R.

57
CAR COUPLERS. (See SAFETY APPLIANCES.)
CAR DEMURRAGE CASES.

32
CAR LINES

30
CARLOAD RATES

131
CARRIAGE, COST OF.

132
CARRIERS
accident reports

13
annual reports

11, 12, 13, 60
business interests of

71
refusal to make returns

11, 12
subject to act

6
CARS

10, 16, 18, 48–50, 53, 65, 82, 131, 135
discrimination in furnishing

48–50, 65
failure to furnish..

18, 53
furnishing

53
number of
private .

10
refrigerator

6, 7, 17, 19, 20, 30, 135
refusal to furnish.

16
CASES PENDING IN THE COURTS.

58
CASES SETTLED AND DISCONTINUED.

55
CASUALTIES TO RAILWAY EMPLOYEES.

87
coupling and uncoupling cars..

87
falling from trains and engines

87
resulting from collisions and derailments.

87
resulting from jumping on or off trains..

87
CATTLE

16, 21, 22
CATTLE RAISERS' ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS
v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy R. Co.

22, 124
v. Missouri, Kansas and Texas R. Co...

21, 125
CAVETT, OH10

16
CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa..

17
CENTERVILLE, IOWA.

15, 20
CENTRAL FREIGHT ASSOCIATION

18
CENTRAL OF GEORGIA R. Co

17, 20
v. Augusta Brokerage Co..

71
v. Murphey ..

70
CENTRAL R. Co. oF NEW JERSEY, MERSHON, SCHUETTE, PARKER & Co., v... 38, 110
CENTRAL VERMONT R. Co., CAPITAL City Gas Co. v..
CENTRAL YELLOW PINE ASSOCIATION v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD Com-

27, 111
CHARGES
elevator

10, 16
refrigeration .

6, 7, 17, 19, 20, 30, 135
CHARLESTON BUREAU OF FREIGHT AND TRANSPORTATION V. NORFOLK AND
WESTERN R. Co....

40, 124
CHARLESTON AND WESTERN CAROLINA R. Co., KEHOE & Co. v.

32, 122
CHARLESTON, S. C

20
CHARLOTTE SHIPPERS' ASSOCIATION v. SOUTHERN R. Co.

39, 120
CHATTANOOGA, TENN.

15, 25, 56, 60
CHESAPEAKE BAY...

36
CHESAPEAKE AND Ohio R. Co.
Interstate Commerce Commission v...

57
Spiegle & Co.v..

40, 126
United States v.

59
CHICAGO AND ALTON R. Co., UNITED STATES V.,

59
CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN R. Co., UNITED STATES V

58
CHICAGO BOARD OF TRADE.

42
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY R. Co.
Cattle Raisers' Association of Texas v..

22, 124
St. Louis Hay and Grain Co. v

32, 119
Union Stock Yards Co. v....

68
United States v......

59

44, 119

PANY .

59

rage.
CHICAGO, ILL 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42, 44, 52, 56, 57, 63, 72
CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN R. Co.
Cannon Falls Farmers' Elevator Co. 2

36, 115
Chicago Live Stock Exchange y

42, 109
Interstate Commerce Commission i.

59, 63
United States v..

59
CHICAGO LIVE STOCK EXCHANGE v. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN R. Co. 22, 42, 63, 109
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND St. Paul R. Co

36
United States v.....
CHICAGO, Rock ISLAND AND Pacific R. Co.
United States v.

59
v. Gardner....

69
CHIEF INSPECTOR OF SAFETY APPLIANCES, REPORT OF

163
CHRISTIANSBURG, VA.

19
CINCINNATI, HAMILTON AND DAYTON R. Co.
Gallogly & Firestine v

49, 118
Interstate Commerce Commission v..

59, 62
CINCINNATI, OHIO

15, 18, 19, 25, 56
CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONS

131
CITY GAS COMPANY OF NORFOLK V. BALTIMORE AND Ohio R. Co

35, 126
CIVIL CASES PENDING IN THE COURTS

58
CLASS AND COMMODITY RATES....

29, 132
CLASSIFICATION..

15, 17, 18, 19, 41, 44, 60, 63, 131
CLASSIFICATION OF RAILWAYS.

81, 82
CLEARFIELD, Pa...

56
CLERICAL FORCE OF THE COMMISSION

93
CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO AND St. Louis R. Co.
Planters' Compress Co. v..

41, 127
Wrigley v

32, 109
CLEVELAND, OHIO..

18, 56
COAL

15, 16, 18, 20, 35, 36, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50, 132
COBHAM, VA

14
COLLISIONS

87
COLORADO.

18, 19, 21, 22, 50
COLORADO FUEL AND IRON Co...

50, 67
COLORED PASSENGERS, DISCRIMINATION AGAINST

71
COLUMBUS, Ohio...

56, 72
COMBINATION RATES

132
COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

132
COMMERCIAL VALUATION OF RAILWAY OPERATING PROPERTY

88-92
Interpretation of figures.

89
Method of

90
COMMISSION'S AUTHORI OVER RATES

9
COMMODITIES, DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN

41
COMPARATIVE INCOME ACCOUNT OF RAILWAYS OF THE UNITED STATES, CONSID-

ERED AS A SYSTEM, FOR THE YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 1904 AND 1903.. 86
COMPENSATION OF RAILWAY EMPLOYEES.

83
COMPETITION

36, 39, 40, 132, 136
water.

136
COMPLAINTS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

14, 132, 137
COMPULSORY TESTIMONY

65
CONCESSION OF RELIEF

132
CONDUCTORS, NUMBER OF .

83
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES.

5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 33, 48, 65, 66, 67, 69, 71
CONNECTICUT

15, 20
CONNECTING LINES

9
CONSOLIDATED FORWARDING Co. v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC Co.,

31, 114
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

9
CONTEMPT CASE, SANTA FE.

66, 67
CORN AND CORN PRODUCTS

15, 19, 43, 49
COST OF CARRIAGE.
Cost OF PRODUCTION.

132
COTTON

8, 41, 42, 132
COTTON-PIECE GOODS.

19
COTTON SEED

19, 54, 71
COTTON WASTE

15
COUPLERS, CAR. (See SAFETY APPLIANCES.)

37,

22, 132

Page.
60–71

65
65
60
63

64
68
66
62
61
61
58
57
53
21
14
83
35
57
16

19
52, 109

20

16
21-55

33
36
32

21
27-29

22

COURT DECISIONS..

compulsory testimony
discrimination in furnishing cars.
hay case.
live-stock and live-stock products case.
mandamus case..
miscellaneous
Pennsylvania petroleum reparation cases.
safety-appliance law...
Santa Fe contempt case
soap case
supersedeas of decree.

Tift case
COURTS, CASES PENDING IN
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
CROSS-TIES
CROSWELL, Mich.
CROZET, VA
CURRENT LIABILITIES.
CURTIS BAY..
CUSEY, B. S.
DAIRY PRODUCTS
DALTON, GA.
DAVIES v. PERE MARQUETTE R. Co
Dawson,

GA
DAYTON, Ohio..
DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSION.

Artz passenger case.
Cannon Falls case
car demurrage cases
cattle-rate case
Central Yellow Pine Association lumber case.
Chicago live-stock terminal charge case
corn and corn-products cases
Davies case
departures from published tariff rates
discrimination between commodities.
discrimination between localities
discrimination between persons
discrimination in facilities
differential freight-rate case
Duluth shingle case.
East St. Louis reconsignment case
furnishing cars
Harrisburg milling-in-transit case
Hope Cotton Oil Čo. case
Kehoe case
live stock and live-stock products case
Memphis case.
Michigan car-line case
Miner case...
minimum-charge case.
miscellaneous cases...
Montpelier coal case.
New York and Long Branch R. R. lumber case
Norfolk coal case
Orange rate cases..
Paxton Tie Co. case
Pitts cases
Planters' Compress Co. case.
Red Rock Fuel Co. case
reparation
St. Louis Hay and Grain Co. case
Santa Fe case
sectional-bookcase proceeding
terminal railroads

H. Doc. 195, 59-1-13

43
52
50
41
33

44

47
33
44

32
48–50

39
53
55
42

35

30
46
32
39
44
38
35
31
53
54
41
47
52
52
50
44
51

25

Page.
DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSION—Continued.
Texas class and commodity rate case..

29
Tift lumber case..
unreasonable rates..

21
Wichita sugar case

37
Yellowstone Park rate case

45
DECISIONS OF THE COURTS

60–71
DEDUCTIONS FROM INCOME.

80, 85
DEMURRAGE

19, 20, 32, 132
DENVER.

20
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

14
DEPARTURES FROM PUBLISHED TARIFF RATES

50
Davies case

52
Santa Fe case

50
terminal railroads

51
DETROIT, MICH.

17, 18
DETROIT SOUTHERN R. Co., Paxton TIE Co. v..

53, 109
DIFFERENTIAL RATES.

18, 33–35, 43, 132
DISCONTINUED CASES

55
DISCRETIONARY FEATURES IN FIXING NOTICE

8
DISCRIMINATION
between commodities..

41-44
corn and corn-products case.

43
Duluth shingle case

44
live stock and live-stock products case

42
Planters' Compress Co. case.

41
sectional-bookcase proceeding

44
between localities

33-39
Cannon Falls case

36
differential freight-rate case

33
Harrisburg milling-in-transit case.

39
Memphis case

35
miscellaneous cases

39
New York and Long Branch R. R. lumber case.

38
Norfolk coal case

35
Wichita sugar case.

37
between persons

44-46
Miner case..
Montpelier coal case

44
Yellowstone Park rate case.

45
in facilities....

47-50
furnishing cars

48-50
Red Rock Fuel Co. case

47
in furnishing cars

48–50, 65
Gallogly & Firestine case

49
Richmond elevator case.

48
Thompson case

49
in refrigeration charges

7
unjust

33-52, 136
DISTANCE

132
DISTRIBUTION OF CARS.

48–50, 65
DIVIDENDS

80, 81, 84, 85
DIVISION OF THROUGH RATES

133
DODGE City, KANS

19, 54
DOYLE, Mich

21
DRESSED BEEF.

17,20
DRESSED POULTRY

17
DUBLIN, GA.

15, 56
DULUTH, Minn

36, 37, 56
DULUTH SHINGLE Co., v. DULUTH, SOUTH SHORE AND ATLANTIC R. Co.

44, 111
DULUTH, South SHORE AND ATLANTIC R. Co., DULUTH SHINGLE Co. V

44, 111
EARNINGS AND EXPENSES OF RAILWAYS.

79–81, 84-86
East CAPE GIRARDEAU

16
East RADFORD, VA..

19
East St. Louis, ILL...

16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 33, 37, 51, 53, 56, 60
EAST ST. LOUIS RECONSIGNMENT CASE

32

46
16, 20

11, 12

8, 133

Page.
ECLIPSE TRANSFER COMPANY.

51
ELECTRICAL INSTRUMENTS.

16
ELEVATOR ALLOWANCES.

16, 20
ELEVATOR CHARGES

10,16
ELKINS LAW

13, 50–52, 57, 67, 133
evasions of.

13
favorable comments upon.

13
modification of former view.

13
proceedings for injunction..

57
ELLENTON, S. Č...
EMPLOYEES OF RAILWAYS.

83
casualties to..

87
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS.

12
ENGINEMEN

83
ENLARGEMENT OF JURISDICTION
as to carriers.

6
as to transportation..

6
EQUIPMENT, RAILWAY

82
EQUIPMENT TRUST OBLIGATIONS.

83
ERIE, PA..

34
EVANSVILLE AND TERRE HAUTE R. Co., KEHOE & Co. v..

55, 122
EVANSVILLE, IND

16, 18, 20, 25
EVIDENCE.

133
EXAMINATION OF BOOKS OF ACCOUNT

11
recommendations as to..

11
refusal to make annual returns
ton-mile rate.

11
EXORBITANT REFRIGERATION CHARGES

7
EXPENSES, EARNINGS AND

79–81, 84-86
EXPENSES, OPERATING .

80, 84-86
EXPORT RATES ....
EXPRESS, EARNINGS FROM

85
FACILITIES OF TRAFFIC.

47, 133
discrimination in.

47
FAIRPORT, N. Y...

34
FALLING FROM TRAINS AND ENGINES, CASUALTIES RESULTING FROM

87
Fall RIVER, Mass.

16
FARGO, N. DAK

58
FENTON, Mich

17
FERNANDINA, FLA

16, 20, 33
FIFTEENTH SECTION

9
FIFTH SECTION.

33, 62, 133, 134
FILING OF TARIFFS

7
FINAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1904

81-88
FIREMEN

83
FIRST SECTION

6, 14, 15, 16, 133
FLIPPO, KANSAS City, MEMPHIS AND BIRMINGHAM R. Co. v

69
FLORIDA

33
FLOUR.

16, 19
FORMAL PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED BEFORE THE COMMISSION DURING THE YEAR..
FOREST PRODUCTS
FORT WAYNE, IND

18
FORT WORTH, TEX

17, 20, 54
FOURTH SECTION

14, 15, 16, 40, 133, 134
FOURTH-TRACK MILEAGE

81
FREE PASSES AND FREE TRANSPORTATION.

13
FREIGHT
carried

84
cars. (See cars)

82
locomotives.

82
revenue.

85
FRUIT..

52
FUNDED DEBT OF RAILWAYS
GAINESVILLE, Tex.

17
GALE, ILL

16
GALLOGLY & FIRESTINE V. CINCINNATI, HAMILTON AND DAYTON R. Co

49, 118

137
18, 21

83, 84

« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »