 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, John Herman Merivale - 1819 - 766 էջ
...benevolent, unless they also come within the technical denomination of charitable purposes ? If it might, consistently with the will, be applied to other...trust is too indefinite for the Court to execute. I see DO substantial difference between this case and the former, and therefore consider the point... | |
 | Roper Stote Donnison Roper - 1829 - 630 էջ
...benevolent, unless they also came within the technical denomination of charitable purposes 1 If it might, consistently with the will, be applied to other...trust is too indefinite for the Court to execute. I see no substantial difference between this case and the former, and therefore consider the point... | |
 | Leonard Shelford - 1836 - 1090 էջ
...benevolent, unless they also came within the technical denomination of charitable purposes. And as it might consistently with the will be applied to other than strictly charitable purposes, the trust was too indefinite for the court to execute. (u) 10 Ves. 543. See9Ves. 399; ante, p. 85. See Vezey... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, James William Mylne, Richard Davis Craig - 1837 - 748 էջ
...wholly charitable, but whether he is bound so to apply it ;" and in James v. Allen (b) lie says, " If the property might, consistently with the will,...trust is too indefinite for the Court to execute." In this case, the Appellants contend that the latitude given is so great, that the terms of the bequest... | |
 | James Hill - 1845 - 704 էջ
...charitable, but whether he is bound so to apply it" (<>). And in another case the same learned judge says, " If the property might consistently with the will be...trust is too indefinite for the court to execute" ( p). Thus in Coxe \. Sattet (9), where a testator " authorized and empowered" his trustees, to continue... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1874 - 664 էջ
...charitable, but whether he is bound so to apply it." And in James v. Allen, 3 Mer., 17, he says further: "If the property might, consistently with the will,...trust is too indefinite for the court to execute."— See also Ellis v. Selby, 1 Myl. & C., ATIOKKRY GlUBBAL t> . 8 OVLB . If the ambiguity involves the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1852 - 718 էջ
...Morice (a) \ Moore.s PCC p. 293. 1851. M»riec v. The Bishop of Durkam (a); and if the property iright, consistently with the will, be applied to other than strictly charitable purposes, the trust i;< too indefinite for the Court to execute ; James v. Allen (A). The cases of gifts to a country,... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1870 - 628 էջ
...benevolence is also an object of his charity." The ground of the decision was, that as the bequest could, consistently with the will, be applied to other than strictly charitable purposes, the court could not execute the trust. In Williams v. Kerskaw, 5 Clark $ Fin. Ill, note, the devise was... | |
 | 1916 - 1326 էջ
...so to apply it " ; and another observation of the same learned Judge in James v. Atten(5) : " If it [the property] might consistently with the " will...trust is too indefinite for the Court to execute." I have referred to EUis v. Selby(2) because it seems to me to answer the suggestion that upon the principle... | |
 | Frederick Pollock, Robert Campbell, Oliver Augustus Saunders, Arthur Beresford Cane, Edward Potton, Joseph Gerald Pease, William Bowstead - 1894 - 736 էջ
...benevolent, unless they also come within the technical denomination of charitable purposes ? If it might, consistently with the will, be applied to other...trust is too indefinite for the Court to execute. I see no substantial difference between this case and the former, and therefore consider the point... | |
| |
If it might, consistently with the will, be applied to other than strictly charitable purposes, the trust is too indefinite for the Court to execute. 
