Lackawanna Jurist, Հատոր 5Lackawanna Bar Association., 1905 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 100–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 2
... parties . " But this is not special damages within the meaning of the law , but general . Special damages are such as the law will not ihfer from the nature of the words themselves . They must , therefore , be specially claimed in the ...
... parties . " But this is not special damages within the meaning of the law , but general . Special damages are such as the law will not ihfer from the nature of the words themselves . They must , therefore , be specially claimed in the ...
Էջ 6
... parties and for the same cause of action , can be pleaded in abatement . - John A Neuls vs. City of Scranton , 31 ... parties have a domicil in the state where the proceedings are instituted . Domicil is the true test of jurisdiction ...
... parties and for the same cause of action , can be pleaded in abatement . - John A Neuls vs. City of Scranton , 31 ... parties have a domicil in the state where the proceedings are instituted . Domicil is the true test of jurisdiction ...
Էջ 7
... parties waive a ' jury trial and submit the case to a judge , his decision is equivalent to a verdict . A compulsory non - suit , however , does not take the place of a verdict . Upon application proceedings will be stayed until costs ...
... parties waive a ' jury trial and submit the case to a judge , his decision is equivalent to a verdict . A compulsory non - suit , however , does not take the place of a verdict . Upon application proceedings will be stayed until costs ...
Էջ 9
... parties . The law is settled that the return cannot be contradicted by either party in the action in which it is made.-J. O. Ackerman vs. Joseph Josephs , 25 . Evidence of . FRAUD . An absolute conveyance will not be set aside on the ...
... parties . The law is settled that the return cannot be contradicted by either party in the action in which it is made.-J. O. Ackerman vs. Joseph Josephs , 25 . Evidence of . FRAUD . An absolute conveyance will not be set aside on the ...
Էջ 13
... parties served were served as defendants , or because they were found in possession . - Henry Kaufhold vs. Wil- liam J. Burke , 223 . Duty of . JURY . It is the duty of a jury to attempt to reconcile the testimony on the side of both ...
... parties served were served as defendants , or because they were found in possession . - Henry Kaufhold vs. Wil- liam J. Burke , 223 . Duty of . JURY . It is the duty of a jury to attempt to reconcile the testimony on the side of both ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of assembly affidavit affirm alleged amended amount Answer appeal apply April 19 auditors bill bond borough breaker cause of action charge city of Scranton claim coal Common Pleas Commonwealth Company consider contract counsel Court of Common court of equity damages declaration deed defendant defendant's demurrer duty entitled evidence execution filed held indictment issue January John F Joseph Joseph E judge judgment June jurisdiction jury justice Lackawanna County Lackawanna river land Langan lease letters testamentary libel lien Luzerne county March Martin Walsh Mary Hosie ment Messrs November Opinion by Edwards paid parties payment person petition Philadelphia County plaintiff plea in abatement Pleas of Lackawanna proceedings prosecutor provides question quo warranto reason receipt referred Refused replevin road rule sheriff statute suit Summerhill Term testator testified testimony thereof tion treasurer trial verdict Walsh warrant witnesses writ
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 98 - ... of said interrogatories the sum of $140.54 due defendant. The answer also avers that this sum constitutes wages earned by defendant by his labor as an employe of the garnishee. The garnishee further contends that as wages the funds in its hands are not subject to attachment under the provisions of the Act of June 16, 1836, PL 755, as amended by the Act of April 15, 1845, PL 459, 42 PS §886.