Page images
PDF
EPUB

expect that they would render praise to God, according to the benefits received? But how is the fact? Are they by nature more spiritually minded than their neighbours of a rougher temperament? What do all the gradations in the moral scenery of human society, corresponding with those which are observable upon the face of a country,-what do they present to the eye, but as deep a slumber, as pervaded mute and unconscious matter? As in one case, the lily feels as little gratitude as the thorn, and would require the same almighty power to elicit from it the voice of thanksgiving; so in the otheer, a man of the loveliest natural endowments, has as little regard for the person and authority of God, as one who is cast in the roughest mould. Both are dead in trespasses and sins, and equally need the power of God to quicken them into spiritual life.

This, in brief, is the conclusion to which Dr. C. conducts us, though we have not followed in his track. But we must not withhold from our readers the counter part of the last quotation, in his own words :

"Conceive," says he, "that a quickening and realizing sense of the Deity per vaded all the men of our species-and that each knew how to refer his own endowments, with an adequate expression of gratitude to the unseen author of them; from whom we ask, of all these various individuals, would you look for the halle

luiabs of devout ecstacy? Would it not

be from him whom God had arrayed in the splendour of nature's brightest ac complishments? Would it not be from him, with whose constitutional feelings the movements of honour and benevolence were in the fullest harmony? Would it not be from him whom his Maker bad cast into the happiest mould, and attempered into sweetest unison with all that was kind, and generous, and lovely, and ennobled by the loftiest emotions, and raised above his fellows into the finest spectacle of all that was graceful, and all that was manly? Surely, if the possession of these moralities be just another theme of acknowledgment to the Lord of the spirits of all flesh, then, if the acknowledgment be withheld, and these moralities have taken up their residence in the bosom of him who is utterly devoid of piety, they go to aggravate the reproach of his Vol. 4.-No. I.

ingratitude; and to prove, that, of all the men upon earth who are far from God, he stands at the widest distance, he remains proof against the weightiest claims, and he, of the dead in trespasses and sins, is the most profoundly asleep to the call of religion, and to the supremacy of its righteous obligations."--pp. 32, 33.

It is by arguments such as these, that Dr. C. labours to convince of sin those, who have a mere constitutional, or instinctive righteousness without godliness. They are children of wrath even as others, and need the same radical change of heart to fit them for heaven.

From this part of his subject, which more properly belongs to the first discourse than the present one, Dr. C. proceeds to specify what he calls two sets of requirements in the Gospel; and supposes, that the Apostle had this important classification in his eye, when he penned the text. Thus, generosity, compassion and truth, are in themselves so lovely and honourable, that they are sure to obtain the applause of the world, at the same time that they are enjoined by the authority of Scripture; and here the declaration of Paul is verified, that "he, who in these things serveth Christ, is both accepted of God and approved of men." But there is another set of requirements, where the will of God is utterly at variance with the applause of men ;-such as giving the heart to Him, crucifying the flesh with the affections and lusts, coming out from the world and living a life of self-denial, faith and prayer.

This is certainly an important distinction, and is employed by Dr. Chalmers with great advantage, in the prosecution of his plan. Thus, when a person does what is approved of men, we have by no means the same evidence of his acting from christian principle, as when, in the face of opposition and scorn, he perseveres in a course of holy obedience. In the one case, though the action is in itself right, it may be performed simply from a desire of human applause; but in the other, the world expresses disapprobation, 4

and therefore, a regard to its opinion cannot be the motive that leads to the action. Many doubtless deceive themselves, by overlooking this distinction. They are sure they cannot be wholly alienated in their hearts from God, since they certainly obey many of his requirements. But what is their governing motive in this obedience? Is it that God commands, or is it that man approves and rewards? The test of character lies here; and there is no more virtue in doing what God requires, from a simple regard to the approbation of men, than if his law had been utterly silent on the subject. The question is not, whether a man before he is renewed, ever does any thing that is amiable and useful,

for this is admitted; but are his motives and feelings right; are they pleasing to Him, who searches the heart? May not all his seeming obedience be accounted for, upon mere worldly and selfish principles? Undoubtedly it may; and it cannot be proved, that there is any thing better in the most splendid exhibitions of patriotism, or integrity, or fidelity,or humanity, which the world can claim as its brightest ornaments. These may exist, as our author has before satisfactorily shown, where there is no love of God in the heart, no humble prayer, no faith, no conscientious obedience.

Towards the close of this discourse, Dr. Chalmers takes notice of an objection, which is often brought against experimental religion, as resulting from a supposed change of heart, viz. that those, who profess to have experienced this change, are so far from being the better for it, that their morality is below the average standard of the community. The way in which this objection is attempted to be substantiated is, by taking a few lamentable cases of manifest insincerity or apostacy, and triumphantly exhibiting these, as fair examples of a whole class of professors. After exposing, in different lights, this sweeping and summary calumny, to the merited reprobation of every candid mind, Dr. C. closes

with the following animated appeal to facts and observation :

"But, instead of making one man's hypocrisy act as a drawback upon the reputation of a thousand, we submit, it it ical procedure, just to betake one's self to would not be a fairer and more philosophthe method of induction-to make a walking survey over the town, and record an inventory of all the men in it who are so very far gone as to have the voice of psalins in their family; or as to attend the meetings of fellowship for prayer; or as scrupulously to abstain from all that is questionable in the amusements of the world; or as, by any other marked and general observation as the members of a visible symptom whatever, to stand out to saintly and separated society. We know, that even of such there are a few, who, if for the reproach they bring upon his masPaul were alive, would move him to weep

ter. But we also know, that the blind and impetuous world exaggerates the few into the many; inverts the process of atonement altogether, by laying the sins of one man upon the multitude; looks at their general aspect of sanctity, and is so engrossed with this single expression of character, as to be insensible to the noble uprightness, and the tender humanity with which this sauctity is associated. And therefore it is, that we offer the assertion, and challenge all to its most thorough and searching investigation, that the Christiandoes nothing but cant, and profess, and ity of these people which many think run after ordinances, has augmented their honesties and their liberalities, and that, tenfold beyond the average character of society; that these are the men we oftenest meet with in the mansions of poverty -and who look with a most wakeful eye over all the sufferings and necessities of our species-and who open their hand most widely in behalf of the imploring and the friendless-and to whom, in spite of all their mockery, the men of the world are sure, in the negociations of business, to award the readiest confidenceand who sustain the most splendid part in all those great movements of philanthro py which bear on the general interests of mankind-and who, with their eye full upon eternity, scatter the most abundant blessings over the fleeting pilgrimage of versation in heaven, do most enrich the time-and who, while they hold their conearth we tread upon, with all those virtues which secure enjoyment to families, and uphold the order and prosperity of the commonwealth."-pp. 50. 51.

tle:-The power of selfishness in promoting the honesty of mercantile in

The third discourse bears this ti

the decision of those who are most conversant in the affairs of business,

that he might let it be tried by a sort of general experience, without resorting to the method of induction. Men of extensive mercantile connections and careful observation, have a kind of undefinable impression, with regard to this subject, on which he places much reliance for the support of his doctrine. He appeals with confidence to those who have hazarded most largely, and most frequently, on the faith of agents and customers and distant correspondents:

"There is no question," he observes, "as to the fact of a very extended practical honesty, between man and man, in their intercourse with each other. The fact. Why is it, that he whom you have only question is, as to the reason of the trusted acquits himself of his trust with such correctness and fidelity? Whether is his mind, in so doing, most set upon yourinterest or upon his own? Whether is it because he seeks your advantage in it, or because he finds in it his own advan tage? Tell us to which of the two concerns he is most tremblingly alive-to your property, or to his own character? and whether, upon the last of these feelings, he may not be more forcibly impelled to equitable dealing than upon the first of them? We well know, that there is room enough in his bosom for both; but to determine how powerfully selfishness is blended with the punctualities and the integrities of business, let us ask those who can speak most soundly and experi mentally on the subject, what would be the result, if the element of selfishness were so detached from the operations of trade, that there was no such thing as a man suffering in his prosperity because he suffered in his good name; that there was no such thing as a desertion of custom and employment coming upon the back of a blasted credit, and ly security we had of man was his prin. ciples, and that his interest flourished and augmented just as surely without his principles as with them? Tell us, if the bold we have of a man's own personal advan

a

tercourse. It is founded on Luke vi. 33: "And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? For sinners also do even the same." In this able and discriminating discourse, Dr. C. advances another step towards the humiliating conclusion, that human nature is wholly depraved, and undertakes to show the very form, in which selfishness more, or less refined and disguised, lies at the foundation of those very actions, which in the honourable fellowship of trade, are generally thought to militate strongly against the scriptural view of depravity. Much of the good done, he maintains is done with the hope of reward; and he is sure, that if there was no expectation of a return in kind, or in popularity, many of the civilities and hospitalities, which are now apparently so cordial, would disappear from human society. Generally speaking, men are not honest because they are lovers of God, nor because they are lovers of virtue; but because they are lovers of their own selves. He seems to have no doubt that if it were possible to separate the expectation of something like an equivalent, from a habit of doing justly and acting kindly, this would not only dry up most of the streams of beneficence, which now give such a freshness to the face of society: but would "arm the majority of mankind into an undisguised hostility a gainst each other, in respect of their rights." "The mere disinterested principle, would oppose but a feeble barrier against the desolating tide of selfishness thus let loose upon the community."" The genuine depravity of the human heart would burst forth and show itself in its true characters; and the world in which we live, would be transformed into a scene of unblushing fraud, and of open and lawless depradation."

This is certainly taking high ground, and we shall proceed to inquire how Dr. C. has acquitted himself in maintaining it. He seems to think, that he might safely submit the question to

tainted reputation; in a word, if the on

tage were thus broken down, in how far

the virtues of the mercantile world would

survive it? Would not the world of trade sustain as violent a derangement on this mighty hold being cut asunder, as the world of nature would on the suspending of the law of gravitation? would not the whole system, in fact, fall to pieces, and be dissolved? would not men, when thus released from the magical chain of their own interest, which bound them together

into a fair and seeming compact of principle, like dogs of rapine, let loose upon their prey, overleap the barrier which for merly restrained them? Does not this prove, that selfishness, after all, is the grand principle on which the brotherhood of the human race is made to hang togeth

er; and that he who can make the wrath of man to praise him, bas also, upon the selfishness of man, caused a most beauteous order of wide and useful intercourse to be suspended?"—pp. 58, 59.

It cannot be questioned, we think, that God has combined the separate interests of men, into a harmonious system of operation for the good of the whole. But if in estimating the character of each individual, it should appear that the mainspring of all his actions is selfishness, and that to this, even his virtues are subordinate, how little credit can be given to the collective body of such a community, on the score of disinterested benevolence?

"The moralities of nature are but the moralities of a day, and will cease to be applanded when this world, the only theatre of their applause is burnt up. They

are but the blossoms of that rank efflores

cence which is nourished on the soil of human corruption, and can never bring forth fruit unto immortality. The discerner of all secrets sees that they emin

ate from a principle which is at utter war with the charity that prepares for the enjoyments, and that glows in the bosoms of the celestial; and, therefore, though highly esteemed among men, they may be, in his sight an abomination."—pp. 60.

From this general view Dr. C. next descends to particulars; and draws his first illustration, from what is often observable in the dissolution of partnerships. When for their mutual advantage in trade, or other business, men enter into such arrangements, and as long as prosperity crowns every enterprise, there may be all the appearance of genuine friendship between the partners and their families, cemented by the daily interchanges of exuberant hospitality. But every such connection of interest and business must be dissolved; and how often, as the time approaches, does the inherent selfishness of human nature, disclose itself to every eye. Where now are those gratuitous expressions of confidence, which

were wont to be lavished, and repaid with interest, by every individual of the firm? How often have we known this sunshine and apparent all warmth, succeeded by cold and dark suspicions, and resulting in the fiercest recriminations! How often has the partnership, in which all concerned, just now appeared so fair and liberal and magnanimous, ended in "a scramble of downright selfishness ?"

And something like this happens so frequently in the fluctuations of trade, as to prove the existence of a deep-rooted and general depravity: and that it does not always happen, may be accounted for in a way not much more creditable to our fallen nature. It may result from a mere worldly wisdom, which perceives that selfishness cannot be indulged in all its strength, without such an exposure of character, as would not only ruin a man in the estimation of his patrons in trade, but in the estimation of the whole community. To ascertain precisely, in what degree the honesty which strikes us so agreeably in a man of business, is resolvable into mere selfishness, it would be necessary to suppose him placed in such circumstances, as to have nothing to hope, or fear from his fellow men. The situation which approaches nearest to this, is that of a man on the eve of bankruptcy; and with no rational prospect of ever retrieving his affairs. In the hour of desperation, he may feel that he has nothing to loose; and how will he then conduct himself?

"In these circumstances, if you have ever seen the man abandon himself to utter

regardlessness of all the honesties which at one time adorned bim, and doing such disgraceful things as he would have spurned at the very suggestion of, in the days of his prosperity; and, forgetful of his former name, practising all possible shifts of duplicity to prolong the credit of a tot tering establishment; and to keep himrestlessness, weaving such a web of entanglement around his many friends and companions, as shall most surely implicate approaches, plying his petty wiles how to some of them in his fall; and, as the crisis survive the coming ruin, and to gather up

self afloat for a few months of torture and

of its fragments to his family. O! how much is there here to deplore; and who can be so ungenerous as to stalk in unrelenting triumph over the helplessness of so

sad an overthrow! But if ever such an exhibition meet your eye, while we ask you not to withhold your pity from the unfortunate, we ask you also to read in it a lesson of worthless and sunken humanity; how even its very virtues are tinctured with corruption; and that the honour and the truth, and the equity, with which man proudly thinks his nature to be embellished, are often reared on the basis of selfishness, and lie prostrate in the dust when that basis is cut away.”—pp. 65.

Evasions of the revenue laws of a state, furnish Dr. C. with another example, which he thinks proves still more satisfactorily the influence of selfishness, on the moral judgment of mankind. There is a strong general reciprocity of advantage, between a government of a country and all its inhabitants. The former protects, and the latter support their protector. Neither can do without the other. But this reciprocity of interest does not necessarily exert a binding influence upon every member of the community. Many an individual calculates that though he should by some dexterous evasion exonerate himself from the burden of taxes, he will still be as well protected as if he paid the full amount. The tie of mutual advantage is thus dissolved. Now such, according to Dr. C. is the actual adjustment of the moral sense and moral conduct of mankind to this state of things, that subterfuges which in the common intercourse of society would disgrace a man forever, are passed lightly over, or perhaps in public estimation more than redeemed by the dexterity of the evasion-a connivance which if extended to the whole of human traffic, would banish all its securities from the world. This goes very far to show, that it is not religious principle which sustains the integrity of human society; but the necessity of the case;" that both the practice of morality and the demand for it, are measured by the operations of a self love, which so far from signalizing any man, or prepar

ing him for eternity, he possesses in common with the fiercest and most degenerate of his species."

Before leaving this topic, we must be permitted to turn the attention of the reader for a moment, to some of the illustrations which have occurred to our own minds in confirmation of the humiliating conclusion, to which Dr. C. has conducted us in the preceding argument. One of the first which presents itself, is found in the history of the late war, or rather of the restrictive system which preceded it. We allude to custom-house oaths, which from being in our country held almost as sacred, as the oath of a witness in a court of justice, became proverbially unworthy of confidence; a circumstance which was so far from stamping the character of the false swearer with infamy, that it was regarded by multitudes, as a commendable proof of dexterity and enterprise. In this particular there has doubtless since been a great change for the better. But who will say, that it has been effected by the reforming efficacy of religious principle? Had man been governed by such a principle, the evil would never have existed. The oath of the custom-house would have retained its hold unbroken upon the conscience. That it did not, goes to show, how little we could depend upon the most solemn asseverations of men, if placed in circumstances where a regard to their own interest bound them as slightly to truth and integrity, as does the oath under which they speak, though attended with its solemn appeal to the Searcher of the heart, and with all its tremendous bearings upon the retributions of eternity. We mean not to say, that every natural man could be induced by the prospect of gain or impunity, to swear falsely; but that such swearing may even become fashionable, as in the case to which I have alluded, and that this affords additional evidence of the desperate depravity of man.

Another illustration of the same kind, might be drawn from that soi

« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »