"Yet let them only share the praises due; Then the Traveller looks at France, with its splendid Court and rich nobles; but here corruption, frivolity, and tawdry ostentation have spread from the Court among the people, and they are idle and vain. In Holland industry has brought wealth, but— "At gold's superior charms all freedom flies, The needy sell it, and the rich man buys; The Traveller returns home to England, the land of freedom. "But fostered e'en by Freedom, ills annoy : That independence Britons prize too high Nor this the worst. As Nature's ties decay, Fictitious bonds, the bonds of wealth and law, Still gather strength, and force unwilling awe." Seeing thus in every state evils which no legislature or special form of government can prevent or cure, Goldsmith looks to the growth of each individual man, and to the rule of "reason, faith, and conscience," as the means by which evils are overcome and happiness secured. “Vain, very vain, my weary search to find How small, of all that human hearts endure, That part which laws or kings can cause or cure! Our own felicity we make or find. With secret course, which no loud storms annoy, Luke's iron crown, and Damien's bed of steel, In "The Deserted Village," Goldsmith sees the result of the commercial prosperity of which England was beginning to boast, as the source of greatness and happiness. It seemed to him that the amassing of large fortunes by a few was the cause of impoverishing many, and that wealth and luxury must exist at the expense of excessive toil and poverty among the labouring class. Those who thus made large fortunes in trade bought up the land once tilled by the peasants in order to build mansions and make parks, so that the poor were obliged to leave their country and find the means of life in other lands. "Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey, But a bold peasantry, their country's pride, When once destroyed can never be supplied." In the rising commercial prosperity of the time, Goldsmith sees a false splendour gilding a certain class, but not a means of raising and providing for the poor. The true greatness of a nation consists in each individual having his share in the prosperity "Ye friends to truth, ye statesmen who survey The "deserted village" is "Sweet Auburn," once "the loveliest village of the plain;" but the village population has been turned out, and obliged to emigrate, for "one only master grasps the whole domain," and the peasants' little fields have been turned into one large estate. We shall see later on how the line of thought started by Goldsmith is followed in Cowper, the poet of the close of the eighteenth century, and in Wordsworth, the poet of the nineteenth. CHAPTER XX. SAMUEL JOHNSON AND HIS FRIENDS (1709—1784). THE great activity of original and independent thought which preceded the French Revolution led not only to the overturning of political tyranny, and the reconstruction of government, but it roused men to examine into all social forms and customs, and to see whether these were placed on a true basis, and whether they were fulfilling rightly the reason of their existence. One of the most important directions taken by this spirit of the time was that relating to the true position of literature, and the right of the author to live by the just payment of his work. In earlier times, when readers were few, this might have been impossible, but now education had made many readers, and created a demand for books; still, however, literature was regarded too much as a means for gratifying the vanity of a writer, and as giving opportunity to a rich man to patronise intellect, and keep it in his pay. Pope had attacked this system, and Swift and Steele and Goldsmith had held themselves, in a measure, independent of patronage; but it needed great strength of character in an author to keep himself wholly free from the service of any party, and great courage and self-denial to be the first to trust to the general intelligence of the people to find out the merit of his work, and to pay him for it according to its real value. There is high honour due, therefore, to Samuel Johnson, who was the first to lead the way along the nobler path of honest, hard work, with a free mind and will, instead of living a life of dependence on the bounty of others, for which flattery and the use of the author's pen were expected in return. Johnson's work, therefore, in relation to English literature is most important, and reaches beyond the influence of his books themselves; for it is the beginning of a new era, such as Milton foresaw in his "Areopagitica," when literature, free from all the shackles of public interference or private interest, should assert the truth with simple faith and courage, trusting to God, and to the light of God in man, for its recognition and reception. Samuel Johnson was born on the 18th of September, 1709. He was the son of a bookseller at Lichfield, and was named Samuel after Dr. Swinfen, who was lodging in the house. He was naturally of an unhealthy constitution, and he suffered from this all his life long. It affected his nerves and muscles, and gave him odd twitchings and contortions of his face, and made him most clumsy and awkward in his movements; there was a fear, also, that disease might at some time attack his brain, and bring on insanity; but it was a part of his brave life to struggle against all these difficulties, instead of making them an excuse for idleness and selfindulgence. At seven years old he was sent to Lichfield Grammar School, where Addison had been more than thirty years before. At fifteen he went to school at Stourbridge, where he gave help in teaching in return for instruction. With some aid from his godfather, Dr. Swinfen, he went to Oxford when he was nineteen. He had made up his mind to "fight his way by literature," and he already showed the way he meant to do it. On one occasion, when some one saw that the poor scholar was in want of new shoes, and put a pair at his door, Johnson indignantly threw them down-stairs. Want of money, probably, prevented his returning home even for the vacations, and the length of his residence at the university is not exactly known. Illness or poverty caused him to leave before he had taken his degree. In 1731 his father died, leaving him £20, and he then had |