15 (1932). However, this does not mean that the courts defer blindly to the legislature. "The greatest weight is given to the judgment of the legislature but it is always open to interested parties to contend that the legislature has gone beyond its constitutional power.' Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 435. Ct. 159 (1922). The expansion and sophistication of the concept of police power is continuous. Police power can be extended to regulate an area which, due to changed circumstances, might now infringe on the public interest. A reasonable business today may be The a menace tomorrow. Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 25 S. Ct. 18 (1904). A Texas court has stated that an oil operator acquired no "vested right" in spacing rules which were in effect at the time his tract was segregated and the lease acquired. very nature of police power, from which the state derives its right to regulate the production of oil and gas, subjects such rules to change from time to time to permit fair and equitable adjustment of the machinery of oil proration to meet changing conditions. Texas Trading v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 161 S.W. 2d 1046-1047. As these cases illustrate, the definition of police power is not static; the scope of legitimate exercise of police power is therefore capable of expansion by movement in another direction such as mandatory storage of industrial petroleum reserves as part of the nation's emergency preparedness. 16 Eminent Domain versus Police Power It should be recognized that there are in fact limits placed upon the use of the police power by the Fifth Amendment. "As long recognized some [property) values are enjoyed under an implied limitation and must yield to the police power. But obviously the implied limitation must have its limits or the contract and due process clauses are gone." Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 43 S. Ct. 158, 159 (1922). At such a Nicholds, Law of Eminent Domain, §1.42 (2) 17 though it amounts to an actual taking or destruction of property. Eminent domain takes property for public use and gives compensation for property taken, injured or destroyed." be compensated. The IPR program does not envision the government taking protection in the event of an Arab boycott or other interruption Actual physical appropriation need not occur to invoke Property is taken in a constitutional sense whenever 18 such inroads are made upon the owner's use of it that, as between private parties, a servitude is acquired either by agreement or in the course of time. U.S. v. Dickinson, 331 U.S. 745, 748 (1947). Similarly, in United States v. In United States v. Causby, 66 S. Ct. 1062 (1946), military planes constantly flew so low over the plaintiff's land that he was deprived of the use and enjoyment of his land for purposes of raising chickens. This constant intrusion on the use of the land constituted a taking entitling him to compensation. Kansas City Life Ins. Co., 70 S. Ct 885 (1950), the Court held that construction of the dam which maintained the river constantly at high water mark, flooding the plaintiff's land entitled the plaintiff to compensation as a result of the "taking". In neither of these cases, did the government attempt to show that these actions came within the police power. It might indeed be difficult to argue that flying low over a chicken farm served the public interest or protected the health of the community. Nonetheless, for this reason, a distinction exists between these cases and the IPR program, which is intended to protect the general safety and welfare. To escape the requirements of compensation in the case of eminent domain, the IPR regulations must clearly demonstrate this distinction; that they serve a legitimate expression of police power, as public safety, general welfare, and development of resources. The purpose of the IPR statute 19 must be shown to be the regulation of industrial petroleum so as to prohibit its being used in a manner detrimental to the public interest, so that it is clearly not a "taking" for the public use. Is it a Burden to be Borne by Public as a Whole? The Fifth Amendment guarantee that private property should not be taken for a public use without just compensation was designed to prevent the government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness, should be borne by the public as a whole. v. U.S. 364 U.S. 40, 48-49 (1960). Armstrong However, in another case the Court states that "[i]t is true that police power embraces regulations designed to promote public conveience or the general welfare, and not merely those in the interest of public health, safety and morals. But when particular individuals are singled out to bear the cost of advancing the public convenience, that imposition msut bear some reasonable relation to the evils to be eradicated or the advantages to be secure." Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Walters, 294 U.S. 405, 429 (1935). In light of the language in these cases, implementation of the IPR program should attempt to minimize the burdens to be borne by the oil companies. Consideration should be given to the possibility of allowing the companies to pass |