Postmodernism and Holocaust Denial
Icon Books, 2001 - 75 էջ
Deborah Lipstadt, in "Denying the Holocaust" (1994), blames postmodernism for creating an intellectual climate favorable to Holocaust denial, and characterizes the latter phenomenon as "deconstructionist history at its worst". Eaglestone argues against this accusation. According to the postmodern view, there is no such thing as objective history. History is a compendium of texts on the past, each of them subjective and dependent on the worldview of its author. However, history as a genre of writing is subject to generic conventions. Holocaust denial is not a kind of history at all, because it does not obey the rules of the genre and has aims different from those of history. This is what the court had in mind in its judgment on the Irving vs. Lipstadt trial in 2000, when it characterized Irving as being not a historian but a racist and antisemite. Argues that the questions postmodernism asks of history and historians are in fact strong weapons in combating Holocaust denial.
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewՀաճախորդի կարծիքը - setnahkt - LibraryThing
I’ve been reading a number of books about postmodernism and deconstructionism recently, but not in any particularly organized fashion. This one turned up on some recommendation list or another, got ... Read full review
able actually American anti anti-Semitic approach archival argued argument asks believe Browning called central claim clearly conventions course court culture Dan Jacobson David debate deniers Denying the Holocaust detail discussed establish Evans evidence example explain fact fight followed genocide genre genre of history Germans give going Goldhagen happen hard Holocaust denial human ideas important impossible interests Irving Irving's issues Jews judge Judgement less Lipstadt London look Lyotard Marxism means ments methodology murder named nature Nazi objective Ordinary particular past perhaps person philosophy phrases postmodernism Press questions race racist reality reasonable historian relation relies responsible result Richard rules Second shown side signified simply sort sources story structure style suggested talk tell texts things thought tion torian trial truth turn understanding University White worldview writing written