...cotton for future delivery was not a regulation of interstate commerce or beyond the power of the State. It follows that sales for future delivery on the Board...commerce so as to be an obstruction or a burden thereon. United States v. Ferger, 250 US 199. It was upon this principle that in Stafford v. Wallace, 258 US...

...Justice Taft, "are not in and of themselves interstate commerce" and "cannot come within the regulator)' power of Congress as such, unless they are regarded...commerce so as to be an obstruction or a burden thereon." An analysis of the act convinced the court that Congress predicated its 17 259 US — , 42 Sup. Ct....

...interstate commerce, we do not rind it possible to sustain the validity of the reparations as they arc set forth in this act." So you will see that the Supreme...to say, referring to the Patten case (226, US 525), involving cotton transactions on the New York Cotton Exchange, that " mere contracts for sales of cotton...

...accompany and mark an exercise of the power under the latter clause." Again,' on page 69, we said: " It follows that sales for future delivery on the Board...commerce so as to be an obstruction or a burden thereon." The Grain Futures Act which is now before us differs from the Future Trading Act in having the very...

...interstate commerce. But the court goes on to make this significant remark: "They cannot come under the regulatory power of Congress, as such, unless...with interstate commerce so as to be an obstruction and burden thereon." Acting on this amiable suggestion, the friends of the measure introduced a new...

...interstate commerce. But the court goes on to make this significant remark: "They cannot come under the regulatory power of Congress, as such, unless...with interstate commerce so as to be an obstruction and burden thereon." Acting on this amiable suggestion, the friends of the measure introduced a new...

...future delivery on the board of trade are not in and of themselves interstate commerce. They cannot come within the regulatory power of Congress as such,...commerce so' as to be an obstruction or a burden thereon. United States v. Ferger, 250 US 199. It was upon this principle that in Stafford v. Wallace, 258 U....

...in and of themselves interstate commerce. They cannot come within the regulatory power of Congress, unless they are regarded by Congress from the evidence...commerce so as to be an obstruction or a burden thereon." Although each act is attempting to regulate the same subject matter, the vital difference between them...

...in and of themselves mterstate commerce. They can not come within the regulatory power of commerce as such, unless they are regarded by Congress, from...commerce so as to be an obstruction or a burden thereon. In other words, the monetary exaction under the Future Trading Act was unconstitutional not because...

...in and of themselves interstate commerce. They can not come within the regulatory power of commerce as such, unless they are regarded by Congress, from...commerce so as to be an obstruction or a burden thereon. In other words, the monetary exaction under the Future Trading Act was unconstitutional not because...