Page images
PDF
EPUB

his face, that Tort was not his agent. The Count had afferted, that the Sieur Tort eloped to France, under the pretext of paffing a few days in the country, with certain merchants of his acquaintance, to which he had obtained his Excellency's confent fome days before. The prefent Memorialift refers to the Ambaffador's letter, of the 24th of June, 1771, to the minifter; in which he exprefsly fays, that, on the 20th of April, at nine in the morning, he gave him leave to pay a vifit to the Countess of Morien

court*.

His meeting with Salvadore at Montreuil, he infinuates, was perfectly accidental. He even declares, that, though he had an interview with him at Chantilly afterwards, yet the only motive he had for feeking that interview was, to communicate to him in confidence what had happened to his Excellency, and to requeft his advice upon it. He owns his having written a letter to the Ambaffador from Chantilly, though by no means a penitential one, or at all the fame with that alluded to by his antagonist. On the particulars of his interview with the Sicur Boyer, he is rather referved; though he exculpates Delpech from the charge

of betraying him into the hands of government; and afferts, that Boyer fent this man thither, in order to prevail with him to leave France t.

The Decifion of this Difpute.

ON the 2d day of June, 1775, the criminal chamber of the Chatelet paffed fentence in the cause between the Count de Guines and the Sieurs Tort and Roger, his fecreta. ries.

It is in fubftance as follows: The complaint of the Sieur Tort against the Count de Guines, refpecting his gaming in the Englifh funds, is declared calumnious, and he is condemned to make reparation to the Ambaffador, according to a procefs to be drawn up; he is further condemned in a fine of 300 livres for damages, to be given, with the confent of the Count, to the prifoners in the Chatelet.

With refpect to the complaint of the Count againft Tort and Roger, for having betrayed the fecrets of the ftate, the two latter are expelled from the court. The Sieur Tort is to pay five fixths of the expence of the procefs, and the Count the other fixth. The other parties are to pay their own expences.'

*As a proof of the Ambaffador's delinquency, the Sieur Tort afferts, that on the morning after his departure, when the Counters of Morien court, full of alarm and apprehenfion, waited upon him to know if he could give her any tidings of the Sieur, his Excellency confeffed to her he was ruined in London, fqueezed her by the hand, and conjured her, in the name of God, not to speak fo loud.

It would be a great pity to omit, on this occafion, the very honourable teflimony the Count de Guines gives of three French merchants, Meffieurs Beaumont, Dainauld, and Fagan. He fays that thefe honeft men, being offered by Tort a fhare in his dealings, were fo fhocked at the iniquity of the plan, on which they were founded, that they refused to have any concern in

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

All the memorials published by Tort are ordered to be erased, fuppreffed, and cancelled, with a ftrict admonition to Mr. F. his advocate, never to publifh any fuch memorials on fuch pains as fhall appertain. Tort, Roger and Delpech, are not cleared from the accufation made by Count de Guines against them, of having abused his name and dispatches, and for other minifterial objects; they are only put out of the Court by the Chate. let upon these points.

Some Account of the apprehending and trying of Robert Perreau, of Golden Square, Apothecary; Daniel Perreau, of Harley-freet, and Margaret Caroline Rudd, for divers Forgeries, &c.

ON

N Saturday evening, March the 11th, a gentleman came to the Public Office, in Bow-ftreet, in company with a woman elegantly dreffed, and inquired for one of the Magiftrates. William Addington, Efq; being then in the parlour, the parties were introduced, when the man, after a fhort preface, in which he acquainted the Juftice, that his name was Robert Perreau, and that he had lived as an apothecary, for fome time in Golden-fquare, in great reputation, faid he was come to do himfelf juftice, by producing the perfon, who had given him a bond for 7500l. which was a forgery. The woman denying the circumftance, and the parties mutually upbraiding each other, Mr. Addington thought proper, as there was great appearance of an iniquitous combination, to commit them

both to Tothill-fields Bridewell, for further examination.

On the next day, from a variety of circumftances, there being a ftrong foundation to believe Robert Perreau's brother Daniel was alfo concerned in the forgery, he was detained in Tothill-fields Bridewell. upon his going to pay Robert a vifit.

The Wednesday following, they 'were all three examined before the bench of Magiftrates at Guildhall, Westminster; but nothing material appeared at this, or any of the fubfequent examinations previous to their trials, but what appeared again at the trials in a more fatisfactory light; except fome few facts, which have been fince found to be falfe; and fome others, the truth of which there is, on that, and many other accounts, all the reafon in the world to difbelieve: we fhall therefore proceed to the trials, juft taking notice, that,, at the above-mentioned examination at Guildhall, Mrs. Rudd was, on making the ufual declarations, admitted an evidence for the crown.

Robert's trial firft came on, on Thurfday, the firft of June, at eight in the morning, before Mr. Justice Afton, Barons Burland and Hotham, &c. at the Seffions-house, in the Old-Bailey. He was indicted for uttering a bond of 7500l. under four counts, the firft with an intent to defraud William Adair, Efq; the fecond to defraud Henry and Robert Drummond, Efqrs. and the other two for uttering and publishing it, knowing it to be forged.

Mr. Howarth, counsel for the profecution, opened the trial, by barely recounting the charges laid in the indictment; he was followed by Mr. Lee, on the fame fide,

who

who expatiated more fully on the nature and circumstances of the of fence; at the fame time remarking to the Jury, that as public juftice was alone the object of the profecution, they were entirely to be guided as the favourable or unfavourable circumstances appeared to them.

Mr. Henry Drummond was the first witness called, who depofed, that about the 15th or 16th of laft January, the prifoner at the bar, whom he had known from being apothecaryin feveral families hewas connected with, came to him to borrow 1500l. to affil him in perfecting a purchase, he had just made, which would come to 14 or 15,000l. that he offered to give him as fecurity the bond of a man, whom he would hereafter name, who was very refponfible. To this Mr. Drummond made anfwer, that the title deeds of fuch an estate would alone be ample fecurity; but this the prifoner objected to, as the bufinefs was to be tranfacted in the country. However, as he wanted the money but for ten days, he would give him as fecurity the leafe of a houfe in Harley-freet, Cavendish-fquare, with his own note for the proper execution of the afGgnment. This Mr. Drummond accepted of.

On the 7th of March following, the prifoner came to him, and after apologizing to him for not being punctual to his time of payment, told him he had a further favour to beg of him, which was to borrow the fum of 75001. more on a bond of William Adair, Efq; out of which he would pay Mr. Drummond his first demand of 1500l. Mr. Drummond defired to fee the bond, which the prifoner produced,

On Mr. Drummond's inspection of it, he expreffed his doubts of its being Mr. Adair's fignature; the prifoner replied, there could not be the leaft doubt of it, for that it was witnessed by two of Mr. Adair's domeftics, Jones and Stark; that he then talked much of Mr. Adair's friendship for him, and he believed, he faid, that this bond was given him by Mr. Adair as the balance of his account. Mr. Drummond's brother and partner coming in on this converfation, was fhewn the bond, who likewife believed it not to be Mr. Adair's; they therefore told the prifoner to call the next day, and they would confider of it. The prifoner at the bar then went away, but returned about two hours afterwards, who faid he faw Mr. Adair juft going out airing; that he told him the circumftance, and that Mr. Adair observed the only reason he could account for Mr. Drummond's thinking it not to be his hand-writing, was the difference of twenty years (much about the time Mr. Drummond had last feen his fignature). This, however, did not fatisfy Meffrs. Drummonds; they fill doubted, and defired he would call next day. In the evening of that day, however, Meffrs. Drummond being refolved to be fatisfied, waited on a friend of Mr. Adair, who affured them it was not his hand-writing.

About eleven o'clock next day the prifoner called; and, as a confirmation of the fignature's being genuine, produced a leiter from Mr. Adair, figned only with the initials W. A. to that purpofe. This, however, would not fatisfy Meffrs. Drummonds; they there, fore propofed to the prifoner going

down

[ocr errors]

down to Mr. Adair's to put an end to their doubts; to this he, at first, made a flight objection, by saying, Perhaps he is gone out; but the others afking it a fecond time, he very chearfully confented, and Mr. H. Drummond and he flept into the latter's carriage, and drove to Mr. Adair's. When they arrived, Mr. Adair not only denied the whole circumftance, but even knowing any of the name of Perreau. This feemed to aftonish the prifoner, as well as the rest of the parties, which made the former reply, Surely, Sir, you are jocular." However, on Mr. Adair's perfifting in the contrary, the prifoner feemed to be agitated, and faid, "Send for Mrs. D. Perreau, and he will explain this matter.' Mrs. D. Perreau (Mrs. Rudd) was accordingly fent for; who, upon being prefled to tell what the knew about it, confeffed herself to be the perfon who forged the bond, and that the made this difcovery fooner than let an innocent man, with a large family fuffer. Mr. Drummond then faid, he did not fee her till the Saturday following at Sir John Fielding's, along with the prifoner and his brother.

[ocr errors]

Mr. G. Wheatly (Clerk to Meff. Drummonds bank) circumftantially corroborated the above evidence, as did Mr. Drummond's brother, with this further circumftance; that when the latter doubted Mrs. Rudd's powers to forge Mr. Adair's name, fhe took up a flip of paper, and wrote the name in every refpect fimilar to that at the bottom of the bond.

Sir Thomas Frankland depofed, that the prifoner was his apothecary for fifteen years; he always believed him to be an honeft man,

and had lent him, at different times, feveral fums of money on bonds, particularly one of Mr. Adair's, for 4000l. on the 24th December, 1774, which was to be paid the 29th March laft..

Mr. R. Wilfon depofed, he filled the bond attempted to be paffed to Meffrs. Drummond; that he had it from the prifoner at the bar, with a minute in his own handwriting, directing him to fill it up as a debt due from W. Adair, Efq; to R. Perreau, Efq; which minute he afterwards defired him to burn, the prifoner at the bar first croffing it with a pen.

Mr. Oglevie depofed, that he was in a familiar acquaintance with Mr. Adair's hand-writing, and that That at the bottom of the bond was no way like it.

Mr. J. Adair depofed the fame; and Mr. Jones, one of the fuppofed fubfcribing witnesses, declared his name to be a forgery.

Thefe evidences being all gone through, the prifoner entered on his defence, which he read from his notes, Mr. Justice Afton having previously pointed out to him where it was neceffary for him to be particular. The prifoner was an hour and twenty minutes reading it, which principally confifted in a detail of the many artifices made use of by Mrs. Rudd to engage him to get thofe bonds difcounted. That he was conftantly converfing about the intereft fhe had with Mr. William Adair.-That, among other things, Mr. Adair had, by his intereft with his majesty, obtained a promife of a baronetage for Mr. Daniel Perreau, and was about procuring him a feat in parliament.That Mr. Adair had promifed to open a bank, and to take the two

Perreaus

Perreaus into partnership with him.
That he received many letters.
figned William Adair, which he
did not doubt really came from
William Adair.That Mr. Wm.
Adair had promised to give them
a very confiderable part of his for
tune during his life; and was to
allow Mr. Daniel Perreau two thou-
fand five hundred pounds per ann.
for his houthold expences, and fix
hundred pounds per ann. for her
pin-money. That Mr. Daniel Per-
reau purchased a house in Harley-
ftreet for four thousand pounds,
which money Mr. William Adair
was to give them. That when
Daniel Perreau was preffed by the
perfon he bought the houfe of for
the money, the prifoner understood
they applied to Mr. W. Adair, and
that his anfwer was, That he had
lent the King feventy thousand
pounds, and had purchased a house
in Pall-mall at feven thousand
pounds to carry on the banking
bufinefs in; therefore could not
fpare the four thousand pounds at
that time. And that Mrs. Rudd
told him, (the prifoner) that Mr.
Adair defired that he would get a
bond for five thousand three hun-
dred pounds filled up, as he had
done once before, and Mr. Adair
would execute it.-That after Wil-
fon had filled up the bond, he de-
livered it to Mrs. Rudd, who gave
it to the prifoner, a day or two af-
ter, executed. That he borrowed
the four thousand pounds upon this
bond, which was dated the 20th
of December, of Sir Tho. Frank-
land, and delivered Sir Thomas's
draught to Mrs. Rudd.That
about the 10th of March he told
Mrs. Rudd, that Mr. Adair's bond,
that he had given to Sir Thomas
Frankland in November, was nearly

VOL. XVIII. 1775.

due; and Mrs. Rudd told him, the next day, that Mr. Adair defired he would once more borrow for him five thousand pounds.-That he made many objections to being employed in fo disagreeable a bufinefs; but at laft, fuppofing he fhould oblige Mr. Adair, he confented, and accordingly got a bond filled up by the Stationer for feven thoufand five hundred pounds, payable to himself.-That he delivered it to Mrs. Rudd, on Saturday the 4th of March, in the prefence of his wife, his brother, and Mr. Caffadey.That Mrs. Rudd returned it him executed on the Tuesday following. And that he never had the leaft fufpicion but that the bonds were really executed by Mr. William Adair. That when he took the bond to Mr. Drummond's, he did not fay that he had himself feen it executed by Mr. Adair, but that he knew it was Mr. Adair's hand-writing, as he had often feen letters from Mr. Adair to Mr. Daniel Perreau and his wife.-That when he informed Mrs. Rudd of the obfervations Mr. Drummond had made upon the fignature to the bond, he went out, and upon her return fhe told him fhe had feen Mr. Adair juft as he was going out a riding; and that Mr. Adair told her, that the alteration in the fignature was merely the difference between age and youth, and that it was his handwriting, and that he told Mr. Drummond fo; and that he knew nothing of its being a forgery till the interview with Mr. Adair.

All thefe circumftances, he granted, made against his understanding; but he hoped the juftice of the Court would judge of him by his intentions, which he appealed to [P]

God

« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »