United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Հատոր 20 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 90–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ xxiv
... Mr. Harper and Mr. D. Hoffman for the appellant , and by Mr. Winder for the
respondent , ) was continued for farther proof . REPORTS OF THE DECISIONS IN
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TABLE OF CASES .
... Mr. Harper and Mr. D. Hoffman for the appellant , and by Mr. Winder for the
respondent , ) was continued for farther proof . REPORTS OF THE DECISIONS IN
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TABLE OF CASES .
Էջ 3
... a warrant on record for those services , bearing the same date and number
with that on which the land now in controversy was entered . There is no proof ,
and no reason to believe , that Thomas Powell ever performed any military
ser1822 .
... a warrant on record for those services , bearing the same date and number
with that on which the land now in controversy was entered . There is no proof ,
and no reason to believe , that Thomas Powell ever performed any military
ser1822 .
Էջ 27
Therefore , where the demandant proves an actual seisin , by a peilis positio , the
tenant cannot be permitted to prove a superior outstand ing title , since it does not
disprove the demandant ' s seisin . But where the demandant relies for proof of ...
Therefore , where the demandant proves an actual seisin , by a peilis positio , the
tenant cannot be permitted to prove a superior outstand ing title , since it does not
disprove the demandant ' s seisin . But where the demandant relies for proof of ...
Էջ 28
... to him by the Commonwealth of Virginia , and dated the 28h day of January ,
1784 , and offered proof of the boundary . But he offered no proof , other than his
patent , that he was ever seized of the land in question . According to the de1822
.
... to him by the Commonwealth of Virginia , and dated the 28h day of January ,
1784 , and offered proof of the boundary . But he offered no proof , other than his
patent , that he was ever seized of the land in question . According to the de1822
.
Էջ 32
That the proof of a prior parent of the same lands to another person would be
sufficient for this purpose , in a case where the demandant relied exclusively
upon a constructive seisin in deed , in virtue of the grant of his patent , has been
already ...
That the proof of a prior parent of the same lands to another person would be
sufficient for this purpose , in a case where the demandant relied exclusively
upon a constructive seisin in deed , in virtue of the grant of his patent , has been
already ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ..., Հատոր 317 United States. Supreme Court Ամբողջությամբ դիտվող - 1943 |
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ..., Հատոր 304 United States. Supreme Court Ամբողջությամբ դիտվող - 1938 |
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ..., Հատոր 320 United States. Supreme Court Ամբողջությամբ դիտվող - 1944 |
Common terms and phrases
acres actual admitted adverse possession alleged answer appear apply armed assignment authority bill called cause certificate Circuit Court circumstances claim commission Company competent condemnation considered construction counsel Court creditors decided decision decree deed defendant directed District Eaton effect entered entitled entry error established Evans evidence examination executed existence fact give given grant ground heirs Hopperboy improvement invention issued John judgment jury Justice land limited machine Marbury March means ment nature necessary neutral never notes notice objection operation opinion original party patent person plaintiff port possession present principle prize proceedings produced proof proved provisions purchase question reason received record reference respect rule ship sovereign specification statute sufficient supposed survey taken thing tion treaty United vessel violation warrant whole witness
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ xi - Rules of Practice for the Courts of Equity of the United States are given in an appendix.
Էջ 526 - WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky.
Էջ 433 - Upon the whole, it is the opinion of the majority of the Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court ought to be affirmed with costs.
Էջ 331 - It seems then to the Court to be a principle of public law, that national ships of war, entering the port of a friendly power open for their reception, are to be considered as exempted by the consent of that power from its jurisdiction.
Էջ 484 - ... 4. Hiring another person to go beyond the limits or jurisdiction of the United States with intent to be enlisted as aforesaid.
Էջ 318 - Each party shall endeavor, by all means in their power, to protect and defend all vessels and other effects belonging to the citizens or subjects of the other, which shall be within the extent of their jurisdiction by sea or by land, and shall use all their efforts to recover and cause to be restored to the right owners, their vessels and effects, which may have been taken from them within the extent of their said jurisdiction, whether they are at war or not with the Power whose subjects have taken...
Էջ x - ... give evidence, it shall be deemed a contempt of the court, which being certified to the clerk's office by the commissioner, master, or examiner, an attachment may issue thereupon by order of the court, or of any judge thereof, in the same manner as if the contempt were for not attending or for refusing to give testimony In the court. But nothing herein contained shall prevent the examination of witnesses viva voce when produced in open court, if the court shall, in its discretion, deem it advisable.
Էջ 344 - King or any of them or the Property of any of them from any Prince or State with which the said King shall be at War: And if any Person of either Nation shall take such Commissions or Letters of Marque he shall be punished as a Pirate.
Էջ 205 - A final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had...
Էջ 69 - ... all estates given in tail shall be and remain an absolute estate in fee simple to the issue of the first donee in tail.
Բիբլիոգրաֆիական տվյալներ
| Վերնագիր | United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Հատոր 20 |
| Հեղինակ | United States. Supreme Court |
| Հրատարակիչ | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1822 |
| Original from | Հարվարդի համալսարան |
| Digitized | 24 Հուլիս 2007 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |