Judging Obscenity: A Critical History of Expert Evidence
McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP, 2003 - 285 էջ
In Judging Obscenity Christopher Nowlin examines expert evidence in North American obscenity trials and reveals how little consensus there is among those who purport to know best about the nature of artistic representation, human sexuality, and the psychological and behavioral effects of reading, writing, or watching explicit sexual narratives and imagery. He demonstrates that these communities of experts are divided on such questions as, Can a novel or film be both high art and obscene? and, Is the world of heterosexual pornography categorically different from the worlds of gay and lesbian pornography? He observes that the ideas of an "average" psychological or behavioral response to a story or an image and the "community" standard of decency or tolerance are outmoded myths that elude all attempts at careful measurement. Nowlin concludes that lack of agreement among experts, for example, as to how and why some sexually explicit imagery titillates or pleases some people, while disgusting or demeaning others, can no longer be viewed simply in terms of moral, religious, or even political predilections. Judging Obscenity traces the way freedom of speech and the right to equality have taken shape within the worlds of pornographic expression and consumption and provides a historical glimpse of changing views about literature and art, as well as a critical examination of the nature of social science research in matters of human sexuality, media-response, and sexual expression.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Constitutional Backdrop for Reviewing Expert Opinions about Pornography
Progressivism and Legislative Facts in the Shaping of Public Policy
Experts and Obscenity Law American Rules and Innovations 18841990
Experts and Obscenity Law Canadian Rules and Derivations 19422000
From Sadomasochism to Child Pornography Experts Narrow Their Focus While Canadian Courts Broaden Their Horizons
Indecency Law Microscopic and Macroscopic Views of the Female Breast and LapDancing in the Dark
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
accepted acts American analysis appears argument artistic become behaviour broader Butler called Canada Canadian challenged child pornography clear clearly community standards concern considered constitutional courts critical decision depictions determine discussed effect example expert evidence expert opinion explains explicit expression fact female finding Frank gay and lesbian harm heterosexual human Ibid imagery images important interests introduced involved issue judges Justice kind knowledge lawyer least legislative legislative facts legislative-fact lesbian literary literature Little Sister's male materials matters means moral nature noted obscenity observes opinion particular perhaps persons political practices presented problem Proceedings prosecution psychological question reader reading reasonable recalls recognized reference regarding relation relevant Report respect Ross rule scene scientific scientists sense sexual Sharpe simply so-called social science society specific suggested survey testified testimony tolerance trial Ulysses United violence witnesses women