(NOTE. The transactions in the preceding indictment being identical in character with those involved in indictment on which same parties were found guilty in the northern district of Illinois, this case has been referred to the Department of Justice for further instructions.)

United States v. W. H. Bennett, formerly General Freight Agent of the Ann Arbor Railroad. Northern district of Ohio. June 7, 1907, indictment found; rebates on shipments of ice.

United States v. Toledo Ice & Coal Co. Northern district of Ohio. December 18, 1906, indictment found; receiving rebates on shipments of ice.

United States v. Standard Oil Co. of Indiana. Western district of Tennessee. October 16, 1906, indictment found; receiving rebates. October 30, 1907, demurrer overruled. November 15, 1907, plea of not guilty.

United States v. Gay Manufacturing Co. Eastern district of Virginia. January 10, 1906, indictment found; receiving rebates.

United States v. Suffolk & Carolina Railway. Eastern district of Virginia. January 10, 1906, indictment found; giving rebates.

United States v. William H. Bosley. Eastern district of Virginia. January 10, 1906, indictment found; giving rebates.

United States v. John S. Schirm, president Grand Canon Lime & Cement Co. Southern district of California. January 9, 1907, indictment found; concessions from Santa Fe Ry. on shipments of lime. February 4, 1907, plea of not guilty.

United States v. Grand Canon Lime & Cement Co. Southern district of California. January 9, 1907, 2 indictments found; rebates from Santa Fe Ry. on shipments of lime. April 26, demurrer overruled; plea of not guilty.

United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. Southern district of California. January 9, 1907, indictment found; rebates to J. S. Schirm on shipments of lime made by Grand Canon Lime & Cement Co. April 26, demurrer overruled; plea of not guilty.

United States v. Pacific Mail S. S. Co. Northern district of California. September 27, October 7, and October 11, 1907, 5 indictments, 12 counts; rebating on shipments of matting moved on joint rates, partly by rail and partly by water, from Kobe, Japan, to inland cities of the United States.

United States v. Southern Pacific Company. Northern district of California. September 27 and October 7, 1907, 7 indictments, 58 counts; rebating on shipments of matting moved on joint rates, partly by water and partly by rail, from Kobe, Japan, to inland cities of the United States.

United States v. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. Western district of Louisiana. January 29, 1907, 2 indictments found; receiving concessions from St. L., I. M. & S. Railway and M. L. & T. R. R. and S. Co. on shipments of oil from Bixby, Ill., to points in Louisiana in 1905; 32 counts.

APPENDIX F.

INFORMAL REPARATION CLAIMS ALLOWED BY THE COMMISSION DURING THE YEAR.

INFORMAL REPARATION CLAIMS ALLOWED BY THE COMMISSION DURING THE YEAR.

1. T. C. Keller & Company v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company. January 17, 1907. Refund of $54.34 on carload of coal shipped from Clinton, Ind., to Baroda, Mich., on account of excessive rate.

2. Eastern Tablet Company v. Mallory Steamship Company. February 16, 1907. Refund of $105 on shipment of paper tablets from Brownsville, N. Y., to Dallas, Tex., on account of excessive rate.

3. Miller-Vidor Lumber Company v. Texas & Pacific Railway Company. February 18, 1907. Refund of $11.80 on carload of lumber from Sodus, La., to Hallettsville, Tex., on account of misrouting.

4. Surrey Lumber Company v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. February 19, 1907. Refund of $3.75 on box of shooks from Wakefield, Va., to Westminster, Md., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

5. Phoenix Cotton Oil Company v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. February 19, 1907. Refund of $158.04 on 14 carloads of cotton seed from Corning and Newark, Ark., to Memphis, Tenn., on account of misconstruction of tariff.

6. Milwaukee Elevator Company v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. February 19, 1907. Refund of $84.63 on 2 carloads of barley shipped from Bushnell, S. Dak., to Milwaukee, Wis., on account of improper routing.

7. Pillsbury-Watkins Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. February 21, 1907. Refund of $354.73 on shipments of ties from Peoria, Ill., to Minneapolis, Minn., through error in publication of tariff.

8. E. D. Hamlin v. Iowa Central Railway Company. February 21, 1907. Refund of $68 on 2 carloads of oats from Vancleve, Iowa, to Kansas City, Mo., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

9. Rosebrook Coal Company v. Iowa Central Railway Company. February 21, 1907. Refund of $14.35 on carload of coal from Eddyville, Iowa, to Alden, Minn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

10. Macy Brothers v. Iowa Central Railway Company. February 21, 1907. Refund of $29.38 on carload of oats from Sully, Iowa, to Kansas City, Mo., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

11. Taylor Manufacturing Company v. Seaboard Air Line Railway. February 23, 1907. Refund on $14.37 on carload of cotton-seed hulls from Columbia, S. C., to Gastonia, N. C., on account of excessive charges.

12. D. E. Ryan Company and F. B. Scott Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. February 23, 1907. Refund of $14.88 and $53.10 on shipments of apples from Nebraska City, Nebr., to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of improper routing.

13. John S. Owen Lumber Company v. Wisconsin Central Railway Company. February 23, 1907. Refund of $16.35 on shipment of building stone from Portland, Conn., to Eau Claire, Wis., on account of charging less than carload rates instead of minimum carload rates.

14. E. P. Stacy & Sons v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. February 23, 1907. Refund of 4 cents per 100 pounds on 6 carloads of apples from Troy, Kans., to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

15. Rogers, Brown & Company v. Southern Railway Company. February 25, 1907. Refund of $40.50 on 2 carloads of pig iron from Sheffield, Ala., to Moberly, Mo., on account of clerical error in tariff schedule.

16. The Hayward H. Kendall Company v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. February 25, 1907. Refund of $18.03 on shipment of coal from Lilly, Pa., to Cleveland, Ohio, for the purpose of adjusting excessive switching charge. 17. The Holcomb Hayes Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company.