Cases Decided in United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals: Customs Cases Adjudged in the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Հատոր 69Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, 1982 |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
67 CCPA administrative affirmed American Export Lines amicus curiae antidumping duty Appeal from United appellant's appellee APPELLEE United application assembly process attorneys for appellant cert Chief Judge chips claims classifiable under item Congress Corp cost Court of Customs Court of International Cust Customs and Patent Customs Court customs law Customs Service decision denial denied entry exported filed further fabrication Government Government's handbags headnote imported merchandise increased duties intervene issue judgment judicial review jurisdiction knapsacks legislative history liquidation luggage MARKEY motion operations Oral argument parties Patent Appeals Paul McGrath petition photodiodes pocket slitting prior art protest remanded Rule Saul Davis Secretary section 516a September 21 settlement specially provided spring assembly statute statutory Subpart substantial transformation sugar Supp supra Tariff Tariff Act Tariff Schedules tion trial court TSUS Uniroyal United States Court USPQ valve Zenith Zenith Radio Corp
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 121 - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art...
Էջ 122 - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
Էջ 180 - USC 1304), requires that every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or container) will permit, in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States the English name of the country of origin of the article, at the time of importation into the Customs territory of the United States.
Էջ 80 - INTERVENTION (a) Intervention of Right. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: (1) When a statute of the United States confers an unconditional right to intervene; or (2) when the representation of the applicant's interest by existing parties is or may be inadequate and the applicant is or may be bound by a judgment in the action...
Էջ 150 - Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses.
Էջ 107 - A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof.
Էջ 123 - Under § 103, the scope and content of the prior art are to be determined; differences between the prior art and the claims at issue are to be ascertained; and the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art resolved.
Էջ 145 - States, unless, after considering the effect of such exclusion upon the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and United States consumers, it finds that such articles should not be excluded from entry.
Էջ 164 - clearly erroneous" when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Էջ 100 - In making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.