 | United States. Patent Office - 1964 - 972 էջ
...Werres, 820. 66. SAME — SAME. — "The mandate of 35 USC 103 which has been ignored below is that 'the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art1 must be found to be obvious. Neither the Examiner nor the Board discussed the signiflcant and... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1957 - 464 էջ
...courts and in writing. Section 103 states this requirement in the title. It refers to the difference between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art, meaning what was known before as described in Section 102. If this difference is such that the subject... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1954 - 480 էջ
...effective while this appeal was pending.5 For it is clear to us that even if it be said that there are "differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art," they "are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time invention was... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1956 - 440 էջ
...can be amended by inserting before the first line thereof, the following : "A patent may be obtained if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would not have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1662 էջ
...not he obtained though the Invention Is not Identically disclosed or described as set forth In wctlon 102 of this title, If the differences between the...subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art mre such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the Invention was made... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1960 - 900 էջ
...invention. This is for the reason that, even though an invention Is "new and useful" it is not patentable "if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the Invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1960 - 1034 էջ
...invention. This is for the reason that, even though an invention is "new and useful" it is not patentable "if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1961 - 1442 էջ
...obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1961 - 1928 էջ
...available under the present statute, 35 USC 103, for convincing J the Commissioner of Patents that the— differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art I are such that the subject matter as a whole would not have been obvious at tin time the invention... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1962 - 938 էջ
...obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter... | |
| |
A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art... 
