1862; the Retribution and the Boston in 1863; the Chickamauga, the Olutsee, and the Tallahassee in 1864. These vessels were said to have taken from sixty to seventy prizes.

Proclamation of
Neutrality.

On the 14th of May 1861 Her Majesty's government issued a proclamation of neutrality, which, said the British Case, "was published fourteen days after the receipt in London of the news that Fort Sumter had been reduced by bombardment, that the President of the United States had called out 75,000 men, and that Mr. Jefferson Davis had taken measures for issuing letters of marque; twelve days after receipt of intelligence that President Lincoln had published a proclamation of blockade; nine days after a copy of that proclamation had been received from Her Britannic Majesty's consul at New York, and three days after the same proclamation had been officially communicated to Her Majesty's secretary of state for foreign affairs by the United States minister, Mr. Dallas." On the 1st of June 1861 Her Britannic Majesty's government issued orders by which the armed ships of both belligerents were forbidden to carry prizes into British waters. The Confederate government remonstrated against these orders, and the Secretary of State of the United States expressed his satisfaction with them as likely to "prove a deathblow to Southern privateering." The gov ernment of the Emperor of the French issued a declaration of neutrality on June.10, 1861; the Queen of Spain on June 17; the government of the Netherlands in the same month, and the Emperor of Brazil on August 1. Declarations, decrees, or notifications were likewise issued by other maritime powers.

As illustrating the course pursued by Her Case of the Sumter. Majesty's government, the British Case took up the case of the Sumter, which sailed from the Mississippi River on June 30, 1861, cruised for six months and captured seventeen prizes. In the course of her cruise she entered the dominions of Spain, the Netherlands, Venezuela, Great Britain, Brazil, and France. She obtained coal and supplies at Cienfuegos, Curaçao, Paramaribo, Trinidad, and Martinique successively. On her arrival at Cienfuegos she had with her six prizes, which she left behind her when she sailed, and which were subsequently released by order of the Captain-General of Cuba, on the ground that they were captured within the territorial waters of that island. She was admitted to the

waters of Curaçao on the written declaration of her commander that she was a ship of war duly commissioned by the government of the Confederate States. In August she was admitted to the port of Paramaribo, in Dutch Guiana, and coaled there, remaining in port eleven days. The Government of the Netherlands subsequently issued orders that no vessel belonging to either belligerent should be allowed to take in more coal than would suffice for twenty-four hours' consumption, or to remain in port longer than forty-eight hours. Before arriving at Paramaribo the Sumter visited Puerto Cabello, in Venezuela, and the British island of Trinidad. She remained at the latter place six days and purchased from private merchants coal and provisions. Permission to purchase coal from the government stores was refused. What took place at Trinidad was brought by Mr. Adams to the attention of Earl Russell on September 30, 1861. Earl Russell replied that the law officers of the Crown had reported that the conduct of the governor of Trinidad was in conformity with Her Majesty's proclamation. The Government of the United States not only sought to have the Sumter treated as a pirate, but also complained of the length of time she was permitted to remain at Trinidad. With a view to prevent the recurrence of similar complaints, the British Government, on January 31, 1862, issued orders absolutely excluding belligerent vessels from the waters of the Bahama Islands, except in case of stress of weather, or of special leave granted by the lieutenant-governor. These islands being very near to the American coast, access to them was of little importance to the armed vessels of the United States except in stress of weather, while to vessels of the Confederate States it was of great importance, the harbors of those States being generally, though not always, effectively blockaded.

The orders thus issued were, the British Case declared, more stringent and comprehensive than those of any other neutral government. The Sumter, after leaving Trinidad, entered in succession the ports of Paramaribo, in Dutch Guiana; of San Juan de Maranham, in Brazil, where she remained ten days; of Port Royal and St. Pierre, in Martinique; and of Cadiz, where she remained fourteen days. She was fourteen days in the waters of Martinique, and procured there, under the written authority of the governor of the island, a full supply of coal for a cruise across the Atlantic, together with other supplies. A few days after her arrival the Iroquois, a man-of-war of the United States, entered Port Royal

harbor, and, finding the Sumter, complained to the governor of Martinique of her receiving French protection. The governor in reply offered the same hospitalities and facilities to the Iroquois as were enjoyed by the Sumter. The captain of the Iroquois was also informed that if the Sumter should leave port before him he would not be permitted to depart until twenty-four hours after her sailing. He left immediately and cruised in the offing with the design of intercepting her, till the night of November 23, 1861, when she made her escape. On January 18, 1862, she arrived at Gibraltar. The authorities observed a neutral conduct in accordance with the Queen's proclamation. The Sumter, in accordance with the rule observed throughout the war toward vessels of both belligerents at all British ports, was refused permission to purchase coal from the government stores, and she was unable to leave Gibraltar for want of coal, the consul of the United States having induced the merchants of the place to refuse to supply her. On the 12th of February 1862 the United States man-ofwar Tuscarora arrived at Gibraltar and proceeded to coal at the neutral port of Algeciras. Two other men-of-war soon arrived, and the Sumter, being unable to escape, was sold at public auction, after having been deprived of her armament, to a British resident at Liverpool. The United States consul at Gibraltar protested against the sale on the ground that it was "for the purpose of avoiding a capture by the cruisers of the United States." Complaint as to the sale was also made by Mr. Adams to Earl Russell, who replied that British naval and military officers at Gibraltar had received instructions not to give any protection to the vessel beyond territorial waters, thus leaving it open to the vessels of the United States to capture her and take her into a prize court. She sailed from Gibraltar on February 7, 1863, and reached Liverpool on the 13th. She remained there till July 3, when she sailed as a merchant vessel, without armament, and carrying as freight some heavy ordnance, which could not possibly have been used on board of her. While in port she was carefully watched, by order of the British Government, as a precaution lest she should be in any way armed or equipped for war. She was wrecked at last in attempting to enter Charleston.

The "Georgia" and the "Nashville."

The course pursued by the British Government in this case was, said the British Case, adhered to in 1864 in the case of the Confederate ship Georgia. But it was afterward judged expedient by the government to prohibit vessels of war belonging to either

belligerent from being dismantled or sold in British ports; although, as the British Case maintained, it was not the duty of a neutral government to prohibit the sale in its territory of a ship owned by a belligerent to a neutral purchaser. Under certain circumstances, as in the case of a ship of war driven by superior force to take refuge in a neutral port, such a sale might be liable to be declared void by a prize court of the other belligerent. But this was a jurisdiction, said the British Case, exercised by prize courts alone, and the sale, until so set aside, was valid everywhere, and operated to transfer the property to the neutral purchaser.

The British Case also referred to the Nashville, which arrived at Bermuda on October 30, 1862, having sailed from Charleston on the 26th. A supply of coal from Her Majesty's dockyard was refused her. She secured a supply from a private yard, and on November 21 arrived at Southampton, having destroyed on her way an American packet ship. On November 22 she went into dock for repairs, and directions were sent from the foreign office that she "should not be allowed to equip herself more completely as a vessel of war, or to take in guns or munitions of war." This measure was the subject of an expression of satisfaction on the part of Mr. Adams.

Confederate Complaints.

From the beginning to the end of the war, said the British Case, Her Majesty's government scrupulously observed in respect to vessels entering British ports or waters under the flag of either belligerent the duties of a neutral power. The United States cruisers entered the ports and waters of Her Majesty's dominions for coaling and other purposes more frequently than the vessels of the Confederate States. The impartial neutrality maintained in these respects by Her Majesty's government was nevertheless a frequent subject of complaint by the Government of the United States, which continued to insist that Confederate vessels ought to have been treated as piratical, or at least excluded altogether; while the Confederate States complained that the regulations enforced were unequal in operation, and unduly disadvantageous to a belligerent whose ports and coasts were under blockade.

and Duties.

The third part of the British Case related to International Rights international rights and duties,” and to “the powers which were possessed by Her Britannic Majesty's government of preventing unlawful equipments, and

the manner and circumstances in and under which these powers were exercised during the war." Under this head the British Case laid down the following general propositions:

"1. A neutral government is bound to exercise due diligence, to the intent that no place within its territory be made use of by either belligerent as a base or point of departure for a military or naval expedition, or for hostilities by land or sea.

2. A neutral government is not, by force of the abovementioned obligation or otherwise, bound to prevent or restrain the sale within its territory, to a belligerent, of articles contraband of war, or the manufacture within its territory of such articles to the order of a belligerent, or the delivery thereof within its territory to a belligerent purchaser, or the exportation of such articles from its territory for sale to, or for the use of, a belligerent.

"3. Nor is a neutral government bound, by force of the abovementioned obligation or otherwise, to prohibit or prevent vessels of war in the service of a belligerent from entering or remaining in its ports or waters, or from purchasing provisions, coal, or other supplies, or undergoing repairs therein; provided that the same facilities be accorded to both belligerents indifferently; and provided also that such vessels be not permitted to augment their military force, or increase or renew their supplies of arms or munitions of war, or of men, within the neutral territory.

"4. The unlawful equipment, or augmentation of force, of a belligerent vessel within neutral waters being an offense against the neutral power, it is the right of the neutral power to release prizes taken by means or by the aid of such equipment or augmentation of force, if found within its jurisdiction.

"5. It has been the practice of maritime powers, when at war, to treat as contraband of war vessels specially adapted for warlike use and found at sea under a neutral flag in course of transportation to a place possessed or occupied by a bellig. erent. Such vessels have been held liable to capture and condemnation as contraband on proof in each case that the destination of the ship was an enemy's port, and provided there were reasonable grounds for believing that she was intended to be sold or delivered to or for the use of the enemy.

"6. Public ships of war in the service of a belligerent entering the ports or waters of a neutral are, by the practice of nations, exempt from the jurisdiction of a neutral power. To withdraw or retuse to recognize this exemption without previous notice, or without such notice to exert, or attempt to exert, jurisdiction over any such vessel, would be a violation of a common understanding, which all nations are bound by good faith to respect.

"7. A vessel becomes a public ship of war by being armed and commissioned-that is to say, formally invested by order or under the authority of a government with the character of a