Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Compania Minera Huehuetenango, lead contract---.

Comparison between Federal assistance extended to foreign min-

Consolidated Copper Mines.

310, 334

23

470

Contracts issued to date, Contract Negotiations Division, De-
fense Materials Procurement Agency--

Contracts with foreign nations other than Canada, ECA, MSA

counterpart funds--

[blocks in formation]

Defense of the United States sealanes in the event of a third
world war.

[blocks in formation]

Domestic copper contracts_-_-_

469

Dumping and break in lead and zinc market (statement of John
R. Govett).

468

Duty-free stockpile purchases.

128

Duty paid on tungsten sold to industry--

130

ECA, MSA authorizations for procurement by commodities and
source countries____

457

ECA, MSA loans.

293

ECA, MSA procurement authorization of materials sent abroad
by commodity and country of destination___.

456

ECA, MSA table of funds given to foreign nations for purchases__
Economic approach to weaken nation__---

455

Economic Cooperation Authority-Mutual Security Agency funds
given to countries for purchases----

455

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Fiscal year 1954, MSA authorizations by area of source, July

[blocks in formation]

General conditions for strategic and control materials and services
contracts

236

Granby Consolidated Mining, Smelting & Refining Co. of Canada__
Hanna Nickel Smelting Co., Riddle, Oreg---.

244

170

Howe Sound Co

489

Hudson Bay Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd..

327

Impossibility to get critical materials from abroad in time of war
Industrial diamond stones_.

2

300

[blocks in formation]

Present and proposed Air Force strength____
Procurement authorizations by commodity and country of destina-

569

tion-Cumulative ECA and mutual defense assistance program,
Apr. 3, 1948, to June 30, 1951___.

456

Procurement authorizations by commodity group and area of
source-Cumulative ECA and mutual defense program, April 3,
1948, to June 30, 1951--

457

[blocks in formation]

Purchase for foreign-operations administration__

31

Purchases for resale by Emergency Procurement Service__
Purchases of pig tin from British Empire_.

32

86

[blocks in formation]

STOCKPILE AND ACCESSIBILITY OF STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL MATERIALS TO THE UNITED STATES IN TIME OF WAR

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1953

UNITED STATES SENATE,

COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS,
Seattle, Wash.

The committee met at 9:15 a. m., pursuant to adjournment, in room 414, United States Courthouse, Seattle, Wash., Senator George W. Malone (chairman) presiding.

Present: Jerome Alderman, chief counsel for the subcommittee, George Holderer, subcommittee staff engineer, Thomas F. Flynn, Jr., subcommittee assistant counsel, and Richard G. Sinclair, subcommittee accountant.

The CHAIRMAN. The meeting will be in order.

This hearing has been called for the purpose of carrying out Senate Resolution 143, 1st session, 83d Congress. (See appendix.) This resolution directs the Interior and Insular Affairs Committee to conduct an investigation and to study the accessibility of critical raw materials to the United States during time of war, also to assure the availability of supplies of such critical raw materials adequate for the expanding economy and the security of the United States.

At this point, I would like to place in the record a list of strategic and control materials. It will appear in the appendix at page 796.

STOCKPILE ACT

Public Law 520 which is popularly known as the Stockpile Act was passed by Congress on July 23, 1946. The intent of the Congress in the enactment of this legislation was to build up a reserve of strategic and critical materials sufficient to tide this country over in case of an emergency.

This act particularly provided "that the natural resources of the United States in certain strategic and critical materials being deficient or insufficiently developed to supply the industrial, military, and other needs of the country for common defense, that it is the policy of Congress and the purpose and intent of this act to provide for the acquisition and retention of stocks of these materials, and to encourage the conservation and development of sources of these materials within the United States, and thereby decrease and prevent wherever possible the dangerous and costly dependence of the United States upon foreign nations for the supplies of these materials in the time of national emergency.

"BUY AMERICAN ACT" CIRCUMVENTION

The act further provided that we "Buy American." My attention has been called to the fact that despite the congressional mandate to buy American it was circumvented by edict of President Truman when he signed the Stockpile Act.

When President Truman approved the Stockpile Act he issued a statement in which he said that it was only because of the overriding importance of the act that he was able to overcome his reluctance in signing a bill with the "Buy American" act provision. He pointed out that there can be exceptions to the rule in "Buy American" and he enunciated a policy to circumvent the "Buy American Act" in the following words: "This provision clearly indicates that the stockpiling program should not be used as a means of general subsidization to those domestic producers who otherwise could not compete successfully with other domestic or foreign producers." Further that "It is the policy of this Government to work for international action to reduce trade barriers."

ECONOMIC APPROACH TO WEAKEN NATION

The committee intends to examine into the background and the origin of the policy followed by President Truman as well as to study the effect that it had on our security and development of the domestic sources for strategic materials. I am certain that President Truman was not aware that his policy originated in the minds of people who did not have the best interests of the United States at heart.

There have been two approaches to defeat our Nation. One is political which is being investigated by several committees in the House and the Senate, and the second is economic. This has been the more subtle, insidious, and effective effort.

Studies made by the committee staff indicate that certain known subversive elements in the Government, in high places in the Treasury Department and other agencies, originated the erroneous theory that the United States is a have-not nation. It was their plan and project to make the United States dependent upon foreign sources of supply which in time of war would fail us and make us vulnerable and defenseless. Informed experts have stated that it would take our domestic raw material sources 3 to 5 years to come into production, and by that time the war may well be lost.

These elements have succeeded in planting in the minds of most of the people in the United States the widespread publicity and with the aid and assistance of well-meaning ill-informed persons that our natural resources have been exhausted, that we must obtain our strategic materials from across the oceans, that we must aid and assist foreign exploration and expansion of the production of raw materials abroad, that we should discourage domestic production and exploration for new ore bodies and sources of strategic and critical materials.

IMPOSSIBILITY TO GET CRITICAL MATERIALS FROM ABROAD IN TIME OF WAR

Well-known and authoritative experts agree that in time of war it will be almost impossible, or at the best so costly in ships and men as to make it prohibitive, to ship strategic, critical, and essential materials for war across either major ocean from Europe, the Mediterranean, Africa, the Far and Near East, and Australia. Well-known strategists and tacticians contend that sources for strategic materials in these areas will be denied to us because they are within easy bombing range of our principal potential enemy, the U. S. S. R., and its satellites. Another consideration is that some nations who are presently

« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »