What they wanted however of the sublime, they endeavoured to supply by hyperbole; their amplification had no limits; they left not only reason but fancy behind them; and produced combinations of confused magnificence, that not only could not be credited, but could not he imagined. Yet great labour, directed by great abilities, is never wholly lost: if they frequently threw away their wit upon false conceits, they likewise sometimes struck out unexpected truth: If their conceits were far-fetched, they were o ten worth the carriage. To write on their plan, it was at least necessary to read and think. No man could be born a metaphysical poet, nor assume the dignity of a writer, by descriptions copied from descriptions, by imitations borrowed from imitations, by traditional imagery, and hereditary similies, by readiness of rhyme, and volubility of syllables. In perusing the works of this race of authors, the mind is exercised either by recollection or inquiry; either something already learned is to be retrieved, or something new is to be examined. If their greatness seldom elevates, their acuteness often surprises; if the imagination is not always gratified, at least the powers of reflexion and comparison are employed; and in the mass of materials which ingenious absurdity has thrown together, genuine wit and useful knowledge may be sometimes found, buried perhaps in grossness of expression, but useful to those who know their value; and such as, when they are expanded : to perspicuity, and polished to elegance, may give lustre to works which have more propriety though less copiousness of sentiment. This kind of writing, which was, I believe, borrowed from Marino and his followers, had been recommended by the example of Donne, a man of a very extensive and various knowledge; and by Jonson, whose manner resembled that of Donne more in the ruggedness of his lines than in the cast of his sentiments. When their reputation was high, they had undoubtedly more imitators, than time has left behind. Their immediate successor, of whom any remembrance can be said to remain, were Suckling, Waller, Denham, Cowley, Cleiveland, and Milton. Denham and Waller sought another way to fame, by improving the harmony of our numbers. Milton tried the metaphysick style only in his lines upon Hobson the Carrier. Cowley adopted it, and excelled his predecessors, having as much sentiment and more musick. Suckling neither improved versification, nor abounded in conceits. The fashionable style remained chiefly with Cowley; Suckling could not reach it, and Milton disdained it. CRITICAL REMARKS are not easily understood without examples; and [ have therefore collected instances of the modes of writing by which this species of poets, for poets they were called by themselves and their admirers, was eminently distinguished. AS the authors of this race were perhaps more desirous of being admired than understood, they sometimes drew their conceits from recesses of learning not very much frequented by common readers of poetry. Thus Cowley on Knowledge: The sacred tree midst the fair orchard grew; The phoenix Truth did on it rest, And built his perfum'd nest, That That right Porphyrian tree which did true logic shew. The very shade they cast did other lights outshine. On Anacreon continuing a lover in his old age: Love was with thy life entwin'd, Of thine, like Meleager's fate. More enflam'd thy amorous rage. In the following verses we have an allusion to a Rabbinical opinion concerning Manna: Variety I ask not: give me one Like manna, has the taste of all in it. Thus Donne shews his medicinal knowledge in some encomiastick verses. In every thing there naturally grows A Balsamum to keep it fresh and new, If 'twere not injur'd by extrinsique blows; Keeps off, or cures what can be done or said. Though the following lines of Donne, on the last night of the something in them too scholastic, they are not inelegant: This twilight of two years, nor past nor next, Debtor to th' old, nor creditor to th' new, year, have DONNY Yet more abtruse and profound is Donne's reflection upon Man as a Microcosm. If men be worlds, there is in every one All All the world's riches: and in good men, this Of thoughts so far fetched, as to be not only unexpected, but unnatural, their books are full. To a Lady, who wrote poesies for rings. Then the sun pass through 't twice a year, The sun, which is esteem'd the god of wit. COWLEY. The difficulties which have been raised about identity in philosophy, a by Cowley with still more perplexity applied to Love: Five years ago, (says story) I lov'd you, My members then, the father members were From whence these take their birth, which now are If then this body love what th' other did, 'Twere incest, which by nature is forbid. here. The love of different women is, in geographical poetry, compared to trave through different countries. Hast though not found each woman's breast (The land where thou hast travelled) Either by savages possest, Or wild, and uninhabited ? What joy could'st take, or what repose; Whilst Pride, the rugged Northern Bear, And where these are temperate known, The soil's all barren sand, or rocky stone. A Lover, burnt up by his affection, is compared to Egypt: The fate of Egypt I sustain, COWLEY. COWLEY. The lover supposes his lady acquainted with the ancient laws of augury and rites of sacrifice. And yet this death of mine, I fear, When sound in every other part, That the chaos was harmonised, has been recited of old; but whence the Th' ungovern'd parts no correspondence knew ; Earth made the Base; the Treble, flame arose. COWLEY. The tears of lovers are always of great poetical account; but Donne has extended them into worlds. If the lines are not easily understood, they may be read again: On a round ball A workman, that hath copies by, can lay, An Europe, Afric, and an Asia, And quickly make that, which was nothing, all. So doth each tear, Which thee doth wear, A globe, yea world, by that impression grow, Till thy tears mixt with mine do overflow This world, by waters sent from thee my heaven dissolved so. On reading the following lines, the reader may perhaps cry out-Confusion rse confounded. Who but Donne would have thought that a good man is a telescope? › Though God be our true glass through which we see All, since the being of all things is he, Yet are the trunks, which do to us derive Things in proportion fit, by perspective Deeds of good men; for by their living here, Virtues, indeed remote, seem to be near. Who would imagine it possible that in a very few lines, so many remote ideas could be brought together? Since 'tis my doom, Love's undershrieve Why this reprieve? Why doth my she advowson fly Incumbency? To sell thyself dost thou intend And hold the contrast thus in doubt, Think but how soon the market fails, And if to measure age's span, The sober Julian were th' account of man, CLEVELAND. OF enormous and disgusting hyperboles, these may be examples: |