...Foster and Elam v. Xeilson, 2 Peters, 314, has said: * That a treaty is to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature...operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision.'' Sec. 126. Prohibitive form. tTNITED STATES v. MARIGOLD (9 How., 566-567): "Congress are...

...Foster & Elam vs. Neilson, 2 Pet. 253, 314, it was said that a treaty 'was to be regarded in Courts of justice as equivalent to an Act of the legislature,...operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision.' In the case of The Cherokee Tobacco, 11 Wall.. 616, 621, this Court said ' a treaty may...

...constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, therefore, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature,...operates of itself, without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, where either of the parties engage...

...Constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature,...operates of itself, without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages...

...stated, speaking for the Supreme Court of the United States : " A treaty is to be regarded in Courts of Justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature,...operates of itself, without the aid of any legislative provision." And, indeed, the making of treaties very narrowly escaped remaining under the Constitution...

...p. 427; quoted in AD 1935-1937, Case No. 167, p. 355) that a treaty is "to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature,...operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision." In any event, at the moment when the legal tie between the States themselves is cut by...

...the supreme law of the land. It has been established since Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet. 253, 314 (1829) an act of the legislature, whenever it operates of itself, without the aid of any legislative provision." The House of Representatives claimed as early as 1796 that "when a treaty stipulates regulations...

...Constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature,...operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages...

...Constitution." Foster and Elam v. Nettson, Z Pet. 314. "That a treaty is to be regarded, in courts of justice, as equivalent to an act of the legislature,...operates of itself, without the aid of any legislative provision." The majority of the treaties entered into by the United States with Indians have been ratified...

...declares a treaty to be the supreme law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature,...operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages...