...production of goods for interstate commerce. It wa» sustained on the grounds that while manufacture is not itself interstate commerce, the shipment of manufactured...and the prohibition of such shipment by Congress is a lawful regulation of interstate commerce.1< This represented a significant intrusion upon the sovereign...

[ Ներեցեք, այս էջի պարունակությունն արգելված է: ]

[ Ներեցեք, այս էջի պարունակությունն արգելված է: ]

...some other objectionable manner. In United States v. Darby, supra, the US Supreme Court stated that "while manufacture is not of itself interstate commerce,...shipment by Congress is indubitably a regulation of the oommp rce. The power to regulate commerce is the power 'to prescribe the rule by which commerce is...

...States, with foreign States and with the Indian tribes. The power is to regulate, not to carry on, commerce. The power to regulate commerce is the power to prescribe the rule according to which it shall be carried on or governed. Gi bbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1 ; Cooley v. Port...

...v. Ogden419 and overruling Hammer v. Dagenhart,420 held the law Constitutional: While manufacturing is not of itself interstate commerce, the shipment...shipment by Congress is indubitably a regulation of commerce. . . . The power of Congress over interstate commerce is not confined to the regulation of...

[ Ներեցեք, այս էջի պարունակությունն արգելված է: ]

[ Ներեցեք, այս էջի պարունակությունն արգելված է: ]

...originally most contemplated by the Commerce power. Nonetheless, it's part of our conventional wisdom that the power to regulate commerce is the power to prescribe the rule by which it is governed and although the rule may be a destructive one, that doesn't derogate from the power...

[ Ներեցեք, այս էջի պարունակությունն արգելված է: ]