...Dig. §§ 1C5-169; Dec. Dig. $ 68.*] 4. JUDGMENT (§ 713*) — COLLUSIVENESS — MATTERS CONCLUDED. The judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point in issue is, as a plea, a bar, or as evidence, conclusive between the parties on the same matter directly...

...the first action were admissible in evidence on the trial of the second. It is perfectly well settled that the judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point is, as a plea, a bar; and where there has been no opportunity to plead it, and it is offered in evidence, it is admissible...

...these two deductions seem to follow as generally true: first, that the judgment of a Court of exclusive jurisdiction directly upon the point is, as a plea,...or as evidence conclusive between the same parties, upou the same matter directly in question in another Court; secondly, that the judgment of a Court...

...but the Supreme Court of the state reversed the decision, declaring the law to be well settled that a judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point is, as a plea or evidence, conclusive between the same parties upon the same matter directly in question, in another...

...but the Supreme Court of the state reversed the decision, declaring the law to be well settled that a judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point is, as a plea or evidence, conclusive between the same parties upon the same matter directly in question in another...

...b'ut the Supreme Court of the state reversed the decision, declaring the law to be well settled that a judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point is, as a plea or evidence, conclusive between the same parties upon the same matter directly in question in another...

...it appear to the court that it is for one and the same cause. In civil actions, the general rule is that the judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction...a bar, or as evidence, conclusive between the same partías upon the same matter directly in question in another court. The exception to this rule is...

...considered that the doctrine had no application in the present case, the judgment relied on not being the judgment of a Court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point upon the same matter; and, after an examination of the whole evidence, restored the judgment of the...

...Duchess of Kingston's Case, is as follows : ' From the variety of cases relative to judgments being given in evidence in civil suits, these two deductions seem...plea a bar, or as evidence conclusive, between the parties, upon the same matter directly in question in another court ; secondly, that the judgment of...

...Strode, Estoppel 421, the court said: " From the variety of cases relative to judgments being given in evidence in civil suits, these two deductions seem...plea, a bar, or as evidence conclusive, between the parties, upon the same matter directly in question in another court; secondly, that the judgment of...