...that he paid a valuable consideration for the land. Hdd, that complainant must overcome the answer by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances; and mere proof of suspicious circumstances In connection with the sale to R. will not er.title him...

...inherently improbable, with the only exception that in a criminal case, of perjury and of treason, wherein the testimony of two witnesses or of one witness, and corroborating circumstances must be shown, in view of the above section. — Radich v. Gak, 61 Cal. App. 375, 214 Pac. 1000. s...

...unless one or more overt acts be expressly alleged therein. 1880 — 22. 1103a. A perjury must be proved by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. 1905—696. 1104. Upon a trial for conspiracy, in a case where an overt act is necessary to constitute...

...of the Code of Civil Procedure, which requires as indispensable evidence to a conviction of perjury, the testimony of two witnesses or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. In the absence of any direct authority in either our own Courts or in England I would respectfully...

...of the Code of Civil Procedure, which requires as indispensable evidence to a conviction of perjury, the testimony of two witnesses or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. APPEAL 1927 REX V. WILLIAM (Lupn) NATANSON Haultaln, CJS APPEAL In my opinion therefore the appeal...

...new section 184b, with reference to perjury; this is new law and provides that perjury must bo proven by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. Section 59 amends section 199 of the existing code by striking out an obsolete provision for a view...

...as true. § 1869. Subornation of perjury § 1870. Proof of perjury generally Perjury must be proved by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. § 1871. Testimony of witness provable against him The sections of this Code, which declare that evidence...

...Buckley's Appeal, 48 Га. -191, 88 Am. Doc. 408; Lewis v. Brewster, 57 Pa. 410; Henry v. Zurflieh, 203 Pa. 440, 53 Atl. 243. The proceeding, however,...The decree dismissing the bill is affirmed at the custs of the appellants. CRAWFORD et al. v. FOREST OIL CO. (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Jan. 4,...

...hypothesis. Conceding that there was a time when a rule prevailed in many courts to the effect that the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances, was essential to sustain a conviction for perjury, that rule has long since been relaxed and such testimony...

...1968 of our Code of Civil Procedure, requiring as indispensable evidence to a conviction of perjury the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances, is a statutory enactment of the rule which prevailed at common law. It may be argued with much force...