...performance, because subsequent law forbade, it was also said in the opinion that : "The agreement . . . must necessarily be regarded as having been made subject...commerce as to render that agreement unenforceable or impair its value." It would seem, therefore, that it might also be said, that this possibility was...

...at page 482, the following expression: The agreement between the railroad company and the- Motleys must necessarily be regarded as having been made subject...commerce as to render that agreement unenforceable as to impair its value. That the exercise of such power may be hampered or restricted to any extent...

...said in respect to it : The agreement between the railroad company and the Motleys must neeesaarlly be regarded as having been made subject to the possibility...regulating interstate commerce as to render that agreement unenforcible or to impair its value; that the exercise of such power may be hampered or restricted...

...contract •» as set against the constitutional power to regulate commerce. There the court said, p. 482: "The agreement between the railroad company and the Mottleys must necessarily be regarded as haying been made subject to the possibility that, at some future time, Congress might so exert its...

...individuals or corporations, slxmUl be subject to the power of Congress in the regulation of that commerce." constitutional power in regulating Interstate commerce...agreement unenforceable, or to impair its value." The Court felt it was inconceivable that the exercise of such power "may be hampered or restricted...

...performance of its provisions was erroneous. The ground for this conclusion was thus stated (pp. 482"486): "The agreement between the railroad company and the...commerce as to render that agreement unenforceable of to impair its value. That the exercise of such power may be hampered or restricted to any extent...