...intended to denounce with penalties a transaction like that in the present case. It is a familiar rule, that a thing may be within the letter of the statute...its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers. This has been often asserted, and the reports are full of cases illustrating its application. This...

...intended 1o denounce with penalties a transaction like that in the present case. It is a familiar rule that a thing may be within the letter of the statute...within its spirit nor within the intention of its markers. ' ' The Circuit Court of Appeals in In Re Gardiner, 53 Fed. 1014, said that words may be —...

...jurisprudence it has been held a thing may be within the letter of the law and yet not within the law, because not within its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers. In the case of Stradling v. Morgan, 1 Powd. 206, 75 ling. Reprint, 316, it was said : ''From whkh cases...

...the contribution amounted to more than $250.00. no contribution was required. "It is a familiar rule that a thing may be within the letter of the statute,...its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers." Holy Trinity Church vs United States, 143 US 457. Pierce Rettew vs Philip Bloom of honorably discharged...

...intended to denounce with penalties a transaction like that in the present case. It is a familiar rule, that a thing may be within the letter of the statute and yet not within the statute, because not witnm its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers. This has been often asserted, and the reports...

...act of Congress, yet held that it was not proscribed by that act. "It is a familiar rule," he said, "that a thing may be within the letter of the statute and not within the statute because not within its spirit nor within the intertion of its makers, " and,...

...act of Congress, yet held that it was not proscribed by that act. " It is a familiar rule," he said, "that a thing may be within the letter of the statute and not within the statute because not within its spirit nor within the intention of its makers," and,...

...States, 152 US 570, 38 L. ed. 556, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 720. A thing may be within the letter of a statute, yet not within the statute, because not within its...Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 US 457, 36 L. ed. 226, 12 Sup. Ct. Rop. 511. General terms should be so limited in their application as...

...need for setting out the history of it. The law does not require a vain thing. "It is a familiar rule that a thing may be within the letter of the statute...statute, because not within its spirit, nor within the intentions of its makers." Holy Trinity Church vs United States, 143 US 457, 459. We think this principle,...

...in the present case. It is a familiar rule, that a thing may be within the letter of the c»->nite and yet not within the statute, because not within its spirit, nor v. uhin the intention of its makers. This has been often asserted, and the reports are full of cases...