 | Alan Barnard, Jonathan Spencer - 1996 - 696 էջ
...institutional sites as important for reproducing power relations, Foucault (1981: 93) descrihed power as 'not an institution, and not a structure; neither...strength we are endowed with; it is the name that one attrihutes to a complex strategical situation in a particular society'. Influenced hy Foucault's analysis,... | |
 | George Pavlich - 1996 - 202 էջ
[ Ներեցեք, այս էջի պարունակությունն արգելված է: ] | |
 | Adam Podgórecki, Jon Alexander, Rob Shields - 1996 - 372 էջ
...mobilities, the concatenation that rests on each of them and seeks in turn to arrest their movement.... [I]t is the name that one attributes to a complex strategical situation in a particular society (1980:93). One cannot reduce his mechanism of power to the representation of law. It takes... | |
 | 1996 - 584 էջ
[ Ներեցեք, այս էջի պարունակությունն արգելված է: ] | |
 | Peter Louis Galison, David J. Stump - 1996 - 584 էջ
...stability over time in power relations, it is because these relations are reenacted and reproduced: power "is the name that one attributes to a complex strategical situation in a particular society.""' Power is disseminated throughout the body politic. Power relations are material, and locally... | |
 | George C. Pavlich, George Pavlich - 1996 - 224 էջ
...not an institution and not a structure; neither is it a certain strength we are endowed with; it is a name that one attributes to a complex strategical situation in a particular society' (1978: 93).9 Any strategic situation is transient, and never contained within the boundaries... | |
 | 1998 - 306 էջ
[ Ներեցեք, այս էջի պարունակությունն արգելված է: ] | |
 | John Storey - 1998 - 674 էջ
...on each of them and seeks in turn to arrest their movement. One needs to be nominalistic, no doubt: power is not an institution, and not a structure;...to a complex strategical situation in a particular society. Should we turn the expression around, then, and say that politics is war pursued by other... | |
| |
One needs to be nominalistic, no doubt; power is not an institution, and not a structure; neither is it a certain strength we are endowed with; it is the name that one attributes to a complex strategical situation in a particular society. 
