...586; Benar vs. Lippus, 25 'Lane. Law Review, 300. A plaintiff in replevin must recover, if at all, on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of his adversary's. A part owner of a chattel cannot maintain replevin for his undivided part, and if it appear in the...

...right of possession from the state, he could not recover. 2. SAME. Plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of his adversary's. [Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 17, Ejectment, § 18.] 3. SAME— EVIDENCE....

...himself, but the right to possession (Weideman vs. Ricker, 44 Pa. Sup. Ct, 85) ; and could recover only on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of his adversary's (Reinheimer vs. Hemingway, 35 Pa., 432; Swope vs. Crawford, 16 Pa. Sup. Ct., 474). Therefore, proof...

...authority of the decided c-ases and of the text-writers, that the plaintiff in ejectment must succeed on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of the defendant's. Chamberlain v. Taylor, 105 N. Y. 185, 11 NE 625 ; Roberts v. Baumgarten, 110 NY 380,...

...Company, the defendants in possession. "Title is that which supports the rightful possession of property. The plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of his adversary's. Whether or not a resulting trust was created at the time the patent from the commonwealth was granted...

...re-locator after he has lost or abandoned his prior right. Belk v. Meaffher, supra. In this action the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary. The question to be settled by judicial determination, so far as he is concerned,...

...a re-locator after he has lost or abandoned his prior right. Belk v. Meagher, supra. In this action the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary. The question to be settled by judicial determination, so far as he is concerned,...

...a relocator after he has lost or abandoned his prior right. Belk v. ileagher, tupra. In this action the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary. The question to be settled by judicial determination, so far as he is concerned,...

...a re-locator after he has lost or abandoned his prior right. Belk v. Meagher, supra. In this action the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of that of his adversary. The question to be settled by judicial determination, so far as he is concerned,...

...an action to recover possession of it must follow the rule applicable in cases of ejectment, namely, that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of defendant's. A cannot drive B from C's properly, says the Court; "whether the defendant has title,...